Erratum to: Development and evaluation of mosquito-electrocuting traps as alternatives to the human landing catch technique for sampling host-seeking malaria vectors

Table 1 Results of the re-analysis of the density-dependence data with the corrected statistical analysis method, for comparison with Tables 3 and S2 in Maliti et al. [1]

Taxon	Location	Method	β estimate (95 % CI)	r estimate (95 % CI)
An. gambiae s.l.	Indoors	MET:HLC	1.17 (0.08, 2.83)	0.35 (0.00, 0.64)
	Indoors	CA-EG:HLC	1.32 (0.05, 3.67)	0.22 (0.00, 0.54)
	Outdoors	MET:HLC	0.77 (0.32, 1.27)	0.59 (0.27, 0.86)^a
	Outdoors	CA-EG:HLC	0.76 (0.22, 1.33)	0.51 (0.13, 0.83)^a
An. funestus s.l.	Indoors	MET:HLC	1.35 (0.04, 4.02)	0.12 (0.00, 0.43)
	Indoors	CA-EG:HLC	1.45 (0.03, 4.30)	0.13 (0.00, 0.47)
	Outdoors	MET:HLC	1.05 (0.62, 1.51)	0.76 (0.53, 0.94)^a
	Outdoors	CA-EG:HLC	2.97 (0.06, 7.60)	0.15 (0.00, 0.54)

MET mosquito electrocuting trap, HLC human landing catch, CA-EG commercially available electrocuting grid
^aComparisons for which significant correlations were detected using the original methods

ISSN: 1475-2875