Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline demographics of households by trial arm

From: Acceptability of insecticide-treated clothing for malaria prevention among migrant rubber tappers in Myanmar: a cluster-randomized non-inferiority crossover trial

 

Arm 1 (ITC then NTC)

(n = 84 households)

Arm 2 (NTC then ITC)

(n = 84 households)

Respondent (n, %)

 Head

51 (61%)

51 (61%)

 Other

33 (39%)

33 (39%)

Mean age (n ± SD)

33 ± 11

33 ± 11

Gender (n, %)

 Male

52 (62%)

56 (67%)

 Female

32 (38%)

28 (33%)

Mean household size (n ± SD)

3.9 ± 2.0

3.5 ± 1.5

Education (n, %)

 Primary or lower

55 (65%)

51 (61%)

 Middle

16 (19%)

21 (25%)

 Secondary or higher

13 (16%)

12 (14%)

Wealth quintile*

 Highest

12 (14%)

22 (26%)

 Fourth

12 (14%)

22 (26%)

 Middle

17 (20%)

16 (19%)

 Second

18 (21%)

16 (19%)

 Lowest

25 (30%)

8 (10%)

Distance (miles) to the nearest health centre (n ± SD)

3.0 ± 10.7

1.9 ± 2.2

Geographic origin (n, %)

 In-state (Mon)

49 (58%)

57 (68%)

 Out of state (Bago, Irrawaddy, Other)

35 (42%)

27 (32%)

Plans after rubber tapping season (n, %)

 Remain at current plantation

45 (54%)

44 (52%)

 Return home

36 (43%)

37 (44%)

 Work at other plantation

3 (3%)

3 (4%)

Malaria prevention methods used**

LLIN*

40 (48%)

53 (63%)

 Mosquito coil

38 (45%)

36 (43%)

 Wood smoke*

13 (15%)

4 (5%)

 Repellent

5 (6%)

4 (5%)

  1. * Chi square test indicate significant difference of p < 0.05 between arms
  2. ** Multiple responses indicated, only top answers presented