Table 2 Standard key indicators on health facility readiness for malaria care delivery, as assessed in health facility surveys in Huambo and Uíge Provinces, Angola, 2016
From: Evaluating malaria case management at public health facilities in two provinces in Angola
Huambo | Uíge | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
% | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | |
Health facilities | ||||
Offering any malaria diagnostic services | 94 | 79–99 | 100 | a |
RDT | 94 | 79–99 | 100 | a |
Malaria microscopy | 21 | 12–33 | 4.5 | 2–9 |
Offering any malaria treatment | 100 | a | 100 | a |
With RDT or malaria microscopy available on day of visit | 71 | 54–83 | 85 | 67–94 |
With any formulation of ACT available on day of visit | 83 | 66–92 | 79 | 61–90 |
With at least one HCW trained on RDT use | 95 | 78–99 | 90 | 73–97 |
With at least one HCW trained on malaria microscopy | 24 | 15–36 | 4.5 | 2–9 |
With at least one HCW trained on malaria treatment | 99 | 96–100 | 98 | 93–99 |
With guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of malaria | 96 | 90–98 | 51 | 34–68 |
HCWs trained in malaria case management | 81 | 73–87 | 80 | 69–89 |
HCWs supervised in last 6 months | 58 | 49–68 | 69 | 52–83 |