Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of malaria

From: The effect of holes in long-lasting insecticidal nets on malaria in Malawi: results from a case–control study

Variable

Univariable analysisa

Multivariable analysisb

Unadjusted odds ratio (OR)

95% confidence interval (CI)

p value

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p value

pHI category

 Good (< 79 cm2)

Reference

  

Reference

  

 Damaged: (80–789 cm2) vs good

0.44

[0.20–0.95]

0.04*

0.48

[0.21–1.06]

0.07

 Too torn (> 790 cm2) vs good

0.44

[0.14–1.41]

0.17

0.46

[0.14–1.52]

0.20

Age categories, months

 6–12

Reference

  

Reference

  

 13–59

2.14

[1.05–4.36]

0.04*

2.15

[1.02–4.53]

0.04*

Education of caregiver

 None

Reference

  

 Primary

0.43

[0.18–1.01]

0.05

 Secondary and higher

0.24

[0.09–0.70]

0.01*

Caregiver age

1.03

[0.99–1.07]

0.16

1.03

[0.99–1.07]

0.15

SES index

 Lower 80%

Reference

     

 Upper 20%

0.81

[0.43–1.53]

0.51

Child sleeps on

 Floor/mat

Reference

     

 Mattress

0.54

[0.27–1.06]

0.07

Potential breeding sites

 No

Reference

     

 Yes

0.95

[0.51–1.76]

0.87

House eaves

 All or some open

Reference

     

 All closed

0.47

[0.23–0.95]

0.04*

At least 2 windows on different walls

 No

Reference

     

 Yes

0.61

[0.34–1.10]

0.10

Number of nets hanging

0.89

[0.61–1.29]

0.52

Roof type

 Thatch/palm leaf

Reference

  

Reference

  

 Non-thatch/palm leaf

0.35

[0.18–0.67]

0.001*

0.34

(0.17-0.66)

0.002*

  1. * p value < 0.05
  2. aResults of odds ratios for sex, use of repellant, wall materials, and presence of screened windows are not included in the table because they were similar between cases and controls
  3. bAll variables in Table 1 were included in multivariable model building. The final multivariable model presented is the model with lowest AIC