Skip to main content

Table 4 Factors associated with household’s perception towards net care and repair, Ethiopia, 2015

From: Knowledge and perception towards net care and repair practice in Ethiopia

 

Perception towards net care and repair

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)

P value

Negative

Positive

Very positive

Knowledge on net care and repair

 Not adequate

273 (85.8%)

657 (80.6%)

434 (69.8%)

  

 Adequate knowledge

45 (14.2%)

159 (19.4%)

188 (30.3%)

1.58 (1.23, 2.02)

< 0.001

Exposure to information on net care and repair

 No

294 (91.5%)

751 (87.0%)

519 (80.9%)

1.00

 

 Yes

27 (8.5%)

113 (13.0%)

122 (19.1%)

1.24 (0.92, 1.65)

0.16

Discussion on net care and repair in the family

 No

289 (89.7%)

712 (82.4%)

476 (74.2%)

1.00

 

 Yes

33 (10.3%)

152 (17.6%)

166 (25.9%)

1.47 (1.14, 1.89)

< 0.001

Number of LLINs owned

 One

119 (36.9%)

270 (31.2%)

224 (35.0%)

1.00

 

 Two

126 (39.1%)

369 (42.7%)

257 (40.1%)

1.05 (0.83, 1.33)

0.70

 Three or more

77 (24.0%)

225 (26.1%)

160 (24.9%)

1.10 (0.82, 1.49)

0.51

Gender

 Male

248 (77.26%)

687 (79.79%)

526 (81.93%)

1.00

 

 Female

73 (22.74%)

174 (20.21%)

116 (18.07%)

0.72 (0.56, 0.94)

0.06

Age (years)

 18–29

45 (13.98%)

108 (12.50%)

80 (12.46%)

1.00

 

 30–39

89 (27.64%)

264 (30.56%)

193 (30.06%)

0.93 (0.67, 1.30)

0.68

 40–49

70 (21.74%)

217 (25.12%)

162 (25.23%)

0.91 (0.64, 1.29)

0.58

 50–59

44 (13.66%)

113 (13.08%)

100 (15.58%)

1.06 (0.70, 1.58)

0.79

 60+

74 (22.98%)

162 (18.75%)

107 (16.67%)

0.80 (0.55, 1.18)

0.27

Educational status of head of household

 No formal education

185 (57.63%)

457 (52.95%)

336 (52.34%)

1.00

 

 Primary (grade 1–6)

79 (24.61%)

223 (25.84%)

164 (25.55%)

0.98 (0.76, 1.26)

 

 Secondary (grade 7–8)

26 (8.10%)

75 (8.69%)

49 (7.63%)

1.05 (0.72, 1.52)

 

 More than secondary (≥ grade 9)

31 (9.66%)

108 (12.51%)

93 (14.49%)

1.08 (0.78, 1.49)

 

Wealth index

 1st

73 (23.03%)

161 (18.74%)

128 (20.00%)

1.00

 

 2nd

61 (19.24%)

179 (20.84%)

123 (19.22%)

0.90 (0.67, 1.23)

0.52

 3rd

74 (23.34%)

185 (21.54%)

106 (16.56%)

0.70 (0.51, 0.96)

0.03

 4th

63 (19.87%)

182 (21.19%)

118 (18.44%)

0.81 (0.59, 1.13)

0.22

 5th

46 (14.51%)

152 (17.69%)

165 (25.78%)

1.19 (0.85, 1.67)

0.30

Region

 Tigray

41 (12.73%)

212 (24.54%)

191 (29.75%)

1.00

 

 Amhara

89 (27.64%)

218 (25.23%)

175 (27.26%)

0.76 (0.58, 1.00)

0.05

 Oromia

124 (38.51%)

257 (29.75%)

124 (19.31%)

0.49 (0.37, 0.65)

0.00

 SNNP

68 (21.12%)

177 (20.49%)

152 (23.68%)

0.69 (0.52, 0.92)

0.01

  1. The model was controlled for gender, age, educational status, wealth index, and region
  2. Statistically significant association (P value < 0.05) are indicated in italics