Skip to main content
Fig. 9 | Malaria Journal

Fig. 9

From: A spatial agent-based model of Anopheles vagus for malaria epidemiology: examining the impact of vector control interventions

Fig. 9

This figure shows the percent reductions in mosquito abundance as a function of LSM coverage, ITNs coverage and IRS coverage when LSM, ITNs and IRS are applied in combination. The X-axis denotes ITNs coverage and the Y-axis denotes LSM coverage. Each subfigure represents FA reduction percentage for LSM and ITNs coverage with fixed a IRS coverage. ITN and IRS mortality (M) are fixed at 0.5, ITN repellence (R) is fixed at 0.5 and IRS repellence (R) is fixed at 0.1. Each simulation is run for 1 year; LSM, ITNs and IRS are applied at day 100, and continued up to the end of the simulation. The filled contour plots in each subfigure shows isolines which are labelled with specific percent reduction (PR) values. The colourbar at the right side quantifies the PR isolines. The figure represents average percent reduction values of FA of a total of 500 (4 × 5 × 5 × 5) simulations. For ITNs, household-level complete coverage scheme with non-absorbing boundary is used

Back to article page