Table 3 Multivariate analysis of uptake of malaria prevention methods during pregnancy in Senegal
Variables | IPTp uptake and ITN usage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Partial versus none | Optimal versus none | |||
RRR | 95% CI (p value) | RRR | 95% CI (p value) | |
Age (years) | ||||
 < 20 (reference) | 1.00 |  |  |  |
 20–34 | 1.22 | 0.8–1.8 (0.420) | 1.36 | 0.93–1.99 (0.107) |
 35–49 | 1.18 | 0.70–2.02 (0.663) | 1.62 | 1.04–2.52 (0.043) |
Place of residence | ||||
 Urban (ref) | 1.00 |  |  |  |
 Rural | 0.81 | 0.48–1.3 (0.214) | 0.95 | 0.52–1.71 (0.093) |
Wealth index quintile | ||||
 Poorest (ref) | 1.00 |  | 1.00 |  |
 Poorer | 1.27 | 0.9–1.8 (0.727) | 1.72 | 1.13–2.60 (0.188) |
 Middle | 2.01 | 1.4–2.9 (0.145) | 3.56 | 2.21–5.75 (0.003) |
 Richer | 1.19 | 0.60–2.2 (0.254) | 1.93 | 0.94–3.98 (0.825) |
 Richest | 1.43 | 0.71–2.8 (0.526) | 1.51 | 0.67–3.40 (0.957) |
Number of ANC visits | ||||
 4+ | 1.25 | 0.90–1.74 (0.076) | 1.41 | 1.03–1.92 (0.049) |
 1 | 1 |  | 1 |  |
Pregnancy intention | ||||
 Unintended (ref) | 0.74 | 0.52–1.06 (0.076) | 0.68 | 0.47–0.98 (0.040) |
 Intended | 1.00 |  | 1.00 |  |
Region | ||||
 Dakar (reference) | 1.00 |  | 1.00 |  |
 Ziguinchor | 0.42 | 0.20–0.90 (0.024) | 2.21 | 0.85–5.80 (0.109) |
 Diourbel | 2.20 | 0.90–5.00 (0.059) | 10.5 | 3.38–32.9 (0.001) |
 Saint-Louis | 1.26 | 0.71–2.15 (0.421) | 5.30 | 2.20–13.1 (0.001) |
 Tambacounda | 0.41 | 0.19–0.70 (0.030 | 0.87 | 0.33–2.19 (0.784) |
 Kaolack | 0.64 | 0.28–1.27 (0.128) | 1.40 | 0.60–3.80 (0.410) |
 Thies | 1.43 | 0.56–3.50 (0.460) | 4.04 | 1.24–12.8 (0.018) |
 Louga | 1.33 | 0.61–2.87 (0.462) | 6.00 | 2.27–16.0 (0.001) |
 Fatick | 1.08 | 0.53–2.20 (0.824) | 7.90 | 2.82–22.0 (0.001) |
 Kolda | 0.42 | 0.21–0.83 (0.013) | 1.50 | 0.57–3.84 (0.417) |
 Matam | 1.02 | 0.46–2.26 (0.947) | 5.52 | 2.01–15.4 (0.001) |
 Kaffrine | 0.42 | 0.21–0.83 (0.013) | 0.93 | 0.33–2.60 (0.895) |
 Kedougou | 0.41 | 0.18–0.92 (0.031) | 1.40 | 0.46–4.24 (0.542) |
 Sédhiou | 0.61 | 0.31–1.20 (0.176) | 2.47 | 0.95–6.40 (0.062) |