Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of outcome measures, total costs, and cost effectiveness of RACD using microscopy and LAMP by sub-district over study period

From: Costs and cost-effectiveness of malaria reactive case detection using loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to microscopy in the low transmission setting of Aceh Province, Indonesia

Sub-district

Population at risk

Outcome measures

Total cost

Average costs

No. of RACD events

No. of subjects screened

No. infections identified (%)

Total

Per PAR per year

Per RACD event

Per individual screened

Per infection identified

Lhoong

9592

14

511

3 (0.6%)

$12,703

$0.79

$907

$25

$4234

Saree

11,346

12

527

3 (0.6%)

$12,748

$0.67

$1062

$24

$4249

Kuta Cot Glie

10,560

8

377

0 (0%)

$9657

$0.55

$1207

$26

–

Indrapuri

14,052

2

80

0 (0%)

$4391

$0.19

$2196

$55

–

Lhoknga

15,659

0

0

0 (0%)

$2918

$0.11

–

–

–

Total

61,209

36

1495

6 (0.4%)

$42,418

$0.42a

$1178

$28

$7070

  1. Population at risk is defined as total population of sub-district
  2. LAMP loop-mediated isothermal amplification, RACD reactive case detection
  3. aSub-district average cost per PAR