Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality of treatment with ACT

From: Adherence to treatment with artemether–lumefantrine or amodiaquine–artesunate for uncomplicated malaria in children in Sierra Leone: a randomized trial

Per-Protocol

Site 1

Site 2

Treatment adherencea

AL (N = 176)

AQAS (N = 176)

Difference in means

95% CI

p-value

AL (N = 173)

AQAS (N = 181)

Difference in means

95% CI

p-value

Mean  % of treatment (SD)b

99.8% (2.5)

98.6% (7.9)

1.17

− 0.09, 2.42

0.068

97.0% (12.8)

99.2% (6.3)

− 2.19

− 4.37, 0.00

0.050

Correct treatmentc

AL (N = 179)

AQAS (N = 174)

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

AL (N = 178)

AQAS (N = 176)

Odds ratio

95% CI

p-value

Correct dosed

163 (93.1%)

144 (83.7%)

2.64

1.30, 5.39

0.008

128 (77.6%)

149 (88.7%)

0.44

0.24, 0.81

0.008

Correct timinge

163 (93.1%)

166 (96.5%)

0.49

0.18, 1.34

0.165

136 (82.4%)

163 (97.0%)

0.14

0.05, 0.38

< 0.001

Correct durationf

172 (98.3%)

170 (98.8%)

0.67

0.11, 4.09

0.668

156 (95.6%)

164 (97.6%)

0.42

0.13, 1.40

0.159

Correct treatmentg

154 (88.0%)

140 (81.4%)

1.68

0.92, 3.04

0.089

125 (75.8%)

148 (88.1%)

0.42

0.23, 0.76

0.004

Intention-to-treat

Site 1

Site 2

Treatment adherencea

AL (N = 175)

AQAS (N = 172)

Difference in means

95% CI

p-value

AL (N = 165)

AQAS (N = 168)

Difference in means

95% CI

p-value

Mean  % of treatment (SD)b

99.8% (2.5)

98.7% (7.9)

1.14

− 0.09, 2.36

0.069

97.0% (12.7)

99.1% (6.0)

− 2.30

− 4.40, − 0.19

0.032

Correct treatmentc

AL

(N = 175)

AQAS (N = 172)

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

AL

(N = 165)

AQAS (N = 168)

Odds

Ratio

95% CI

p-value

Correct dosed

166 (92.7%)

146 (83.9%)

2.45

1.22, 4.90

0.011

138 (77.5%)

155 (88.1%)

0.47

0.26, 0.83

0.010

Correct timinge

166 (92.7%)

168 (96.6%)

0.45

0.17, 1.23

0.120

149 (83.7%)

170 (96.6%)

0.18

0.07, 0.45

< 0.001

Correct durationf

179 (97.8%)

174 (98.9%)

0.51

0.09, 2.81

0.439

169 (94.9%)

171 (97.2%)

0.55

0.18, 1.67

0.291

Correct treatmentg

156 (87.2%)

142 (81.6%)

1.53

0.85, 2.74

0.153

135 (75.8%)

154 (87.5%)

0.45

0.26, 0.79

0.005

  1. aProportion of all tablets received − information on the number of tablets taken is missing from one participant in the AL group at Site 1 (n = 174). Measure of Effect = Difference of means; AQAS is the reference group
  2. bPercent of treatment = total number of tablets taken by the patient/total number of tablets prescribed
  3. cOdds Ratios were calculated using logistic regression, with ORs calculated using AQAS as the reference group
  4. dDose is defined as the number of tablets prescribed by weight or age. For AQAS: 1 tablet per day for three days. For AL: 5 to < 15 kg = 1 tablet twice a day for 3 days, 15 to < 25 kg = 2 tablets twice a day for three days
  5. eTiming is defined as the number of times per day the treatment should be taken. For AQAS: once daily. For AL: two times per day
  6. fDuration is defined as the number of days the treatment should be taken. For both AQAS and AL: 3 days
  7. gCorrect treatment = correct dose + correct timing + correct duration, in which the criteria for all three factors (as above) are met