Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic evaluation test of LAMP and RDT with nPCR as the gold standard

From: Evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification as a surveillance tool for malaria in reactive case detection moving towards elimination

 

Total number tested

Number positive (%)

Number negative (%)

Sensitivity 95% confidence interval

Specificity 95% confidence interval

Positive predictive value

95% confidence interval

Negative predictive value

95% confidence interval

RDTs

2642

23

2619

9.30% (2.59–22.14%)

99.24% (98.86–99.56%)

17.39% (6.96–37.22%)

98.51% (98.36–98.65%)

LAMP extracted from RDT

2642

45

2597

95.35% (84.19–99.43%)

99.85% (99.61–99.96%)

99.11% (79.34–96.47%)

99.92% (99.70–99.88%)

LAMP extracted from DBS

2640

47

2593

95.50% (84.85–99.46%)

99.92% (99.72–99.99%)

95.56% (84.31–98.85%)

99.92% (99.70–99.98%)

nPCR extracted from DBS

315

43

262

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

  1. RDTs rapid diagnostic test, LAMP loop-mediated amplification, DBS dried blood spot, nPCR nested polymerase chain reaction