From: A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013
Exposures of interest | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Risk ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Risk ratio (95% CI) | p-value | |
Residence | ||||||
Urban | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Rural | 2.04 (1.87–2.23) | < 0.001 | 1.17 (1.03–1.32) | 0.017 | 1.32 (1.15–1.51) | < 0.001 |
Wealth quintile | ||||||
Lowest | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Second | 0.88 (0.78–0.99) | 0.036 | 1.17 (1.03–1.32) | 0.014 | 1.20 (1.06–1.36) | 0.004 |
Middle | 0.83 (0.74–0.93) | 0.002 | 1.32 (1.16–1.51) | < 0.001 | 1.39 (1.21–1.58) | < 0.001 |
Fourth | 0.64 (0.56–0.72) | < 0.001 | 1.36 (1.17–1.57) | < 0.001 | 1.48 (1.27–1.72) | < 0.001 |
Highest | 0.42 (0.36–0.48) | < 0.001 | 1.29 (1.08–1.54) | 0.005 | 1.49 (1.23–1.80) | < 0.001 |
Regional PfPR2–10 (%) | ||||||
< 1 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
1 to < 5 | 6.39 (5.46–7.48) | < 0.001 | 5.96 (2.94–12.12) | < 0.001 | 5.92 (2.83–12.38) | < 0.001 |
> 5 | 5.26 (4.56–6.07) | < 0.001 | 5.36 (3.19–9.02) | < 0.001 | 5.32 (3.09–9.16) | < 0.001 |