From: A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013
Exposure of interest | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Risk ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Risk ratio (95% CI) | p-value | |
Residence type | ||||||
Urban | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Rural | 2.56 (2.37–2.77) | < 0.001 | 1.46 (1.33–1.63) | < 0.001 | 1.62 (1.45–1.81) | < 0.001 |
Wealth quintile | ||||||
Lowest | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Second | 0.80 (0.72–0.88) | < 0.001 | 1.05 (0.95–1.16) | 0.370 | 1.12 (1.01–1.24) | 0.032 |
Middle | 0.69 (0.62–0.76) | < 0.001 | 1.09 (0.97–1.21) | 0.139 | 1.22 (1.10–1.37) | < 0.001 |
Fourth | 0.51 (0.46–0.57) | < 0.001 | 1.05 (0.93–1.18) | 0.474 | 1.29 (1.14–1.46) | < 0.001 |
Highest | 0.33 (0.29–0.38) | < 0.001 | 0.99 (0.86–1.15) | 0.929 | 1.36 (1.16–1.60) | < 0.001 |
Regional PfPR2–10 (%) | ||||||
< 1 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
1 to < 5 | 6.27 (5.41–7.28) | < 0.001 | 5.72 (2.94–11.11) | < 0.001 | 5.05 (2.59–9.85) | < 0.001 |
> 5 | 6.88 (6.03–7.85) | < 0.001 | 6.96 (4.28–11.31) | < 0.001 | 6.10 (3.74–9.97) | < 0.001 |