Measuring malaria diagnosis and treatment coverage in population-based surveys: a recall validation study in Mali among caregivers of febrile children under 5 years

Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of caregivers’ recall of diagnosis procedures at facilities and treatment received during consultation, summarized for all facility types

	Sensitivity^a			Specificity^b			Accuracy^c
	N	%	95% CI	N	%	95% CI	N	%	95% CI
Recall of fever in past 2 weeks	1602	99.7	99.4, 100.0	0	–	–	1602	99.7	99.4, 100.0
Recall of finger/heel stick	792	91.5	89.6, 93.5	796	85.7	83.2, 88.1	1588	88.6	87.0, 90.2
Recall of positive malaria test result^d	421	96.2	94.4, 98.0	154	59.7	51.9, 67.6	575	86.4	83.6, 89.2
Recall that malaria diagnosis was made	1213	74.3	71.8, 76.7	372	74.9	70.5, 79.3	1588	74.4	72.3, 76.6
Recall of any anti-malarial given^e	1235	59.0	56.3, 61.8	336	82.7	78.7, 86.8	1571	64.1	61.7, 66.5
Recall of ACT given^e	755	43.2	39.6, 46.7	794	90.2	88.1, 92.3	1549	67.3	64.9, 69.6
Corrected recall of ACT given^f	787	91.5	89.5, 93.4	807	71.7	68.6, 74.9	1594	81.5	79.6, 83.4

ACT Artemisinin-based combination therapy
^aSensitivity calculated as total true positives (not shown) divided by the number of true positives and false negatives (N)
^bSpecificity calculated as the total true negatives (not shown) divided by the number of true negatives and false positives (N)
^cAccuracy calculated as the sum of true positives and true negatives (not shown) divided by sum of true positives, true negatives, false positives and true negatives (N)
^dAmong those children tested
^eExcludes treatment that caregiver reported receiving from a different facility or healthcare provider
^fRecall of ACT from interview corrected to include instances where caregiver identified ACT from the visual aid, or had retained a prescription including ACT or ACT packaging from the child’s consultation

ISSN: 1475-2875