Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of findings in tests for effects of traps alone (pull only), spatial repellents alone (push only) or combinations of traps and spatial repellents (push–pull) on the biting risk of Anopheles arabiensis indoors and outdoors

From: Evaluation of a push–pull system consisting of transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons and odour-baited traps for control of indoor- and outdoor-biting malaria vectors

Intervention

N

Indoor biting risk (assessed using CDC-light trap)

Outdoor biting risk (assessed using human landing catch)

Mosquitoes trapped

Mean (95% CL)

RR (95% CI)

% Protection

p-value

Mean (95% CL)

RR (95% CI)

% Protection

p-value

Mean (95% CL)

Control

15

16.3 (12.9–19.8)

1

N/A

N/A

124.5 (101.6–152.5)

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

Pull alone (traps)

10

10.0 (7.6–12.4)

0.7 (0.3–1.3)

35.0

0.351

85.5 (71.6–102)

0.7 (0.5–0.9)

31

< 0.01

44.0 (35.5–52.6)

Push alone (spatial repellents)

10

2.7 (1.5–4.0)

0.2 (0.1–0.2)

81.2

0.006

46 (35.7–59.4)

0.4 (0.3–0.5)

63

< 0.01

Na

Push–pull

10

3.4 (0.5–6.4)

0.2 (0.1–0.3)

83.4

0.002

26.3 (21.9–31.6)

0.2 (0.2–0.3)

79

< 0.01

32.6 (19.7–45.5)