Skip to main content

Table 1 Use cases for genetic epidemiology in malaria elimination

From: Use cases for genetic epidemiology in malaria elimination

 

Description

Pre-conditions

Post-conditions

Description

Current method or indicator

Population unit for implementation of analysis

Case detection

Prevalencea

Focus type

Sampling frame

Informatics; priors needed

Potential action informed

Presentation of output

Time to information (ideal)

1. Detect resistance

Assess the prevalence/frequency of molecular markers associated with antimalarial drug resistance

PCR-based testing (currently research focused)

Individuals

Passive or active

High to very low

Active

Representative

Database of resistance alleles in local population; ability to identify possible new parkers

Intervention selection, treatment guidelines, surveillance

Quantitative, geospatial maps

Rapid (< 1 week)b

2. Assess drug resistance gene flow

Monitor and predict the spread of genes conferring drug resistance within and among regions and parasite populations

Treatment efficacy surveys at variable frequencies

Multiple foci (e.g. Areas where administration of drugs is a major component of control effort)

Active

High to very low

Active

Representative

Reference distribution of resistance alleles; model for gene flow with genetic data input

Intervention selection, treatment guidelines, surveillance

Quantitative, geospatial maps, phylogenies

Monthlyb

3. Assess transmission intensity

Stratify regions according to transmission intensity in the area population; monitor interventions and epidemics

Surveillance

Focus

Passive or active

Low to very low

Active

Representativec

Reference distribution of parasite diversity; intensity model using a genetic data input

Intervention selection and evaluation, deployment of resources

Quantitative, qualitative, geospatial maps

Monthly

4. Identify foci

Identify focal areas of high diversity and clusters of infections

Surveillance, case investigation

Geographic area of interest (e.g. Area with unknown distribution of foci or hotspots)

Passive, active, reactive

Moderate to very low

Active to residual non-active

Representative

Algorithm to integrate case detection with geographic and population characteristics

Intervention selection, surveillance, deployment of resources

Phylogenies, geospatial maps

Fast (< 1 month)

5. Determine connectivity of parasite populations

Assess degree to which transmission is linked among regions due to parasite population linkages

Migration data (often produced via modeling)

Multiple foci across a region, country, or continent (e.g. Areas where parasite populations may be linked due to human or parasite migration)

Active

High to very low

Active to residual non-active

Representative

Reference distribution of parasite diversity and human migration patterns; model for parasite flow with genetic data input

Intervention selection and evaluation, deployment of resources

Geospatial network maps

Annual

6. Identify imported cases

Discriminate between indigenous vs. imported cases (sources and sinks)

Travel surveys

Individuals

Passive or reactive

Very low to zero

Active to residual non-active

Dense

Reference distribution of local parasite diversity; high coverage case surveillance

Intervention selection and evaluation, deployment of resources, surveillance, case investigation; certify elimination

Quantitative, phylogenies, network maps

Rapid (< 3 days)d

7. Characterize local transmission chains

Distinguish contributions factors (e.g. seasonality, migrants, asymptomatics, and highly infectious individuals) to ongoing transmission patterns; certify elimination

Case investigations

Focus with limited transmission

Passive or reactive

Low to very low

Active to residual non-active

Dense

Reference distribution of parasite diversity; models engaging geospatial and/or network analysis to distinguish chain length

Intervention selection and evaluation, deployment of resources, surveillance, case investigation; certify elimination

Quantitative, phylogenies, network maps

Fast (< 1 month)

  1. aWhile this information may be applicable at higher levels of prevalence, current methods suggest that genetic information is most useful in areas of low transmission that are progressing to zero
  2. bTreatment regimen may not be adaptable in this timeframe, depending on drug availability
  3. cHigher coverage is required for populations with more complex substructure or high parasite relatedness
  4. dThis period is an estimate of how quickly a decision needs to be made about whether a full case investigation should be conducted