Skip to main content

TableĀ 3 Percentage of reduction of vectorial capacity and reproduction at 10% coverage with vector control or drug related interventions

From: Models of effectiveness of interventions against malaria transmitted by Anopheles albimanus

Intervention

Active ingredient

Evening location of people (until bed time)

An. albimanus northern and central Haiti

An. albimanus Dame Marie

An albimanus Laborde

An. gambiae

IRS

Bendiocarb

Inside

7.21

7.17

7.17

18.15

Ā Ā 

Outside

0.40

2.74

5.13

17.41

Ā 

DDT

Inside

6.55

6.55

6.55

17.27

Ā Ā 

Outside

0.55

2.96

4.95

17.08

Ā 

Ī“

Inside

2.44

2.49

2.49

22.38a

Ā Ā 

Outside

0.04

0.66

1.55

21.27a

Ā 

Ī»

Inside

NA

NA

NA

9.77

Ā Ā 

Outside

NA

NA

NA

9.36

ITNs

Ī»

Inside

0.62

4.17

7.94

34.24

Ā Ā 

Outside

1.82

5.06

7.51

33.30

House screening

NA

Inside

11.35

11.35

11.35

6.60

Ā Ā 

Outside

0.97

5.17

8.61

6.25

LSM

NA

NA

10.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

RTS,S vaccination

NA

NA

3.70

3.70

3.70

3.70

Test and treat

NA

NA

5.47

5.47

5.47

5.47

Case management

NA

NA

2.30

2.30

2.30

2.30

  1. IRS indoor residual spray, ITNs insecticide treated nets, LSM larval source management, Ī“ deltamethrin, Ī» lambdacyhalothrin, NA not applicable/available
  2. aParameterized using data from studies with An. albimanus. The impact of vector control is on vectorial capacity, and the impact of human side interventions is on the reproduction number. The impact of higher coverage is approximately proportional to the coverage for most interventions over most of the range (see Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6)