Skip to main content

Table 2 Mosquito response rates in three studies with three different operators/hosts

From: Quantifying late-stage host-seeking behaviour of Anopheles gambiae at the insecticidal net interface using a baited-box bioassay

 

Response rate (%)

No mosquitoes responding/no. tested

Study

Study 1

Study 2

Study 3

Operator

AG

MA

AH

Mosquito strain

Kisumu

Kisumu

Kisumu

Tiassalé

Treatment

 Untreated

27% (13/48)

76% (25/33)

77% (20/26)

67% (20/30)

 PermaNet 2

18% (7/38)

58% (25/43)

61% (20/33)

61% (20/33)

 Olyset

 

57% (25/44)

 

Total no. tested

86

120

59

63

  1. Within each study, there were no significant differences in responses to Untreated nets and PermaNet 2.0 or Olyset ITNs: Study 1: X2 (1, n = 86) = 0.89, p = 0.35, OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.22–1.72); Study 2: (1, n = 75) = 2.57, p = 0.11, OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.37–1.58); Study 3 (Kisumu) (1, n = 59) = 1.77, p = 0.18, OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.35–1.76) and Study 3 (Tiassalé) (1, n = 63) = 0.25, p = 0.617, OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.41–2.01)