Table 2 Prevalence and density of larvae and pupae in different habitat types in Jinja district
Habitat type | N | % with Anopheles | % < 10 m perimeter | % with culicine | Anopheles density | Culicine density | Pupae density |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Container | 10 | 20.0 | 90.0 | 40.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
Artificial pond | 1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Flood water | 10 | 0.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Foot print | 27 | 22.2 | 100.0 | 14.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Fresh water marsh | 6 | 16.7 | 33.3 | 16.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
lake fringe | 18 | 16.7 | 5.6 | 11.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
open drain | 45 | 2.2 | 91.1 | 28.9 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.3 |
pool | 64 | 12.5 | 92.2 | 14.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
puddle | 43 | 2.3 | 93.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Rice field | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
river fringe | 4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Tyre track | 11 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Water channel | 176 | 6.8 | 48.3 | 5.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 |