Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparing intercept of the ΔQTc vs ΔRR as mean (SD) between arms for each formulae

From: Electrocardiographic safety evaluation of extended artemether-lumefantrine treatment in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Bagamoyo District, Tanzania

Correction formulae

Arm

Mean (SD)

95% CI

P-value*

Bazett’s

Intervention

10.6 (38.6)

3.2–18.1

0.014

Control

− 2.4 (35.0)

− 9.6–4.8

Fridericia’s

Intervention

11.1 (36.5)

3.9–18.3

0.014

Control

− 1.3 (33.6)

− 8.2–5.6

QTc-age

Intervention

10.5 (38.4)

3.0–18

0.022

Control

− 1.9 (36.5)

− 9.5–5.7

  1. Italic values indicate significance of p value (p < 0.05)
  2. * P values were calculated using the t-test for comparing the means of mean change in QTc interval between day 0 and 5 in each treatment arm