Skip to main content

Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of RDT, routine Microscopy, MG-LAMP and expert microscopy using RT-PCR as reference

From: Evaluation of the colorimetric malachite green loop-mediated isothermal amplification (MG-LAMP) assay for the detection of malaria species at two different health facilities in a malaria endemic area of western Kenya

Method

Sensitivity, % (CI)

Specificity, % (CI)

PV, % (CI)

NPV, % (CI)

K-value, % (CI)

Rota dispensary

 RDT

78.1 (67.5–86.4)

93.0 (86.8–97)

88.9 (79.3–95.1)

85.6 (78.2–91.2)

0.72 (0.59–0.86)

 MG-LAMP

82.9 (73.0–90.3)

83.5 (75.4–89.8)

78.1 (68.0–86.3)

87.3 (79.6–92.9)

0.66 (0.52–0.80)

 E-microscopy

72.0 (61–81.3)

100 (96.8–100)

100 (93.9–100)

83.3 (78–87.6)

0.75 (0.61–0.88)

Siaya Hospital

 R-microscopy

83.3 (65.3–94.4)

91.9 (78.1–98.3)

89.3 (71.8–97.7)

87.2 (72.6–95.7)

0.76 (0.52–1.00)

 MG-LAMP

93.3 (77.9–99.2)

73.0 (55.9–86.2)

73.7 (56.9–86.6)

93.1 (77.2–99.2)

0.65 (0.41–0.88)

 E-microscopy

86.7 (69.3–96.2)

91.9 (78.1–98.3)

89.7 (74.4–96.3)

89.5 (77.3–95.5)

0.79 (0.55–1.03)

  1. R-microscopy routine microscopy, E-microscopy expert microscopy, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, CI Confidence Interval