Predictors | ITN utilization practice | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | End-line | Ratio of change | Percent of change | |
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | Change ratio | ESÂ % (95%CI) | |
Intervention | ||||
 End-line | 1 | 2.87 (2.62,3.15) | 2.87 (2.62,3.15) | + 187.0 (162.0–215) |
Districts | ||||
 Nono-Benja | 0.42(0.34,0.52) | 0.70 (0.56,0.88) | 1.67 (1.65,1.69) | + 67.0 (65.0,69.0) |
 Limmu-Kosa | 0.39 (0.31,0.50) | 0.49 (0.39,0.63) | 1.25 (1.23,1.26) | + 25.6 (22.6,26.0) |
 Gera | 0.28 (0.23,0.36) | 1.03 (0.83,1.29) | 3.58 (2.96,3.68) | + 258 (196,268) |
 Shebe-Sombo | 1.36 (1.13,1.64) | 1.85 (1.50,2.30) | 1.36 (1.33,1.40) | + 36.0 (32.7,40.2) |
 Botor-Tolay | 1 | 1 | 1 | Reference |
Sex of family members | ||||
 Male | 1.24 (1.10,1.41) | 1.31 (1.14,1.49) | 1.06 (1.04,1.07) | + 6.0 (4.0,7.0) |
Ethnic groups | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 Oromo | 1 | 1 | 1 | Reference |
 Amhara | 1.77 (1.19,2.61) | 1.19 (0.80,1.77) | 0.68 (0.67,0.91) | − 32.0 (− 33.0,− 9) |
 Others | 2.67 (0.83,7.44) | 7.16 (0.96,42.3) | 2.68 (1.16, 5.69) | +168 (16.0469) |
Ownership and access to ITN | ||||
 Own functional ITN |  |  |  |  |
  Yes | 4.40 (3.66,5.89) | 1.77 (1.43,2.45) | 0.40 (0.39,0.42) | − 59.8 (− 61.0,− 58.4) |
 Number of ITN | 2.15 (1.84,2.51) | 1.61 (1.39,1.86) | 0.75 (0.74,0.760 | − 25.1 (− 26.0,− 24.5) |
 Access (1 ITN for 2 people) | 16.7 (9.8,28.5) | 10.0 (5.8,17.4) | 0.61 (0.59,0.62) | − 39.4 (− 40.8,− 0.38) |
 ITN with hole | 0.74 (0.56,0.93) | 1.04 (0.86,1.26) | 1.41 (1.36, 1.54) | + 40.5 (35.5, 53.6) |
 Number of ITN saved | 0.21 (0.16,0.28) | 0.33 (0.26,0.42) | 1.57 (1.50,1.63) | + 43.0 (37.0,50.0) |
Exposure-to school based education | ||||
 Content intensity | 0.99 (0.96,1.03) | 1.02 (1.01,1.04) | 1.03 (1.01,1.05) | + 3.0 (1.0,5.0) |
 Comprehensive knowledge | 1.89 (1.35, 2.64) | 1.17 (0.86, 1.60) | 0.62(0.61,0.64) | − 38.1 (− 39.4,− 36.3) |
 Cause (mosquito bite) |  |  |  |  |
  Yes | 2.08 (1.54,2.80) | 1.26 (0.90,1.76) | 0.61 (0.58, 0.63) | − 39.4 (− 41.6,− 37.1) |
 Attitude (ITN) | 1.10 (1.03,1.18) | 1.06 (1.01,1.10) | 0.96 (0.93, 0.98) | − 3.6 (− 6.8, − 1.9) |
 Perceived efficacy | 1.02 (1.01,1.03) | 1.03 (1.02,1.04) | 1.01 (1.00,1.01) | + 1.0 (0.9,1.1) |
 Acceptance of ITN | ||||
  For danger control | 1.01 (1.004,1.02) | 1.02 (1.01, 1.03) | 1.02 (1.01,1.03) | + 2.0 (0.6,2.8) |
Community perceived engagement of students as | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Good reminders | – | 1.53 (1.11,2.11) | – |  |