| HFs | HPs | Observations | CHVs |
---|---|---|---|---|
Domain 1: Resource availability, n/N (%) | ||||
Thermometers in stock | 31/35 (89) | Â | Â | 3/34 (9) |
RDTs in stock | 27/35 (77) | Â | Â | 13/26 (50) |
ASAQ in stock | 28/35 (80) | Â | Â | 11/26 (42) |
Primaquine in stock | 15/35 (43) | Â | Â | Â |
Injectable artesunate or quinine in stock | 12/35 (34) | Â | Â | Â |
RDT stock out in past 2Â months | 9/35 (26) | Â | Â | Â |
Providers are able to test for P. vivax | Â | 14/41 (34) | Â | Â |
Providers diagnose P. vivax in their facility | Â | 10/41 (24) | Â | Â |
ACT (age 14 +) stock out in past 2 months | 10/35 (29) |  |  |  |
ACT (age 5–13) stock out in past 2 months | 8/35 (23) |  |  |  |
Stock out of any RDTs and ACTs at time of survey | Â | Â | Â | 19/34 (56) |
Domain 2: Case management, n/N (%) | ||||
Identifies history of fever as criteria for suspect case | Â | 34/41 (83) | Â | 18/26 (69) |
Identifies history of any symptoms in recent traveler as criteria for suspect case | Â | 29/41 (71) | Â | 5/26 (19) |
Asked fever history if patient did not spontaneously report | Â | Â | 92/189 (49) | Â |
Took temperature of patient | Â | Â | 195/300 (65) | Â |
A temperature was recorded | Â | Â | 142/300 (47) | Â |
Performed RDT for patient with reported or recorded fever | Â | Â | 56/129 (43) | Â |
Patient with positive RDT was given an ACT | Â | Â | 4/5 (80) | Â |
Reports asking for travel history | Â | Â | Â | 27/34 (79) |
Reports performing RDT if patient has history of fever | Â | Â | Â | 20/26 (77) |
Reports giving ACT for positive RDT | Â | Â | Â | 12/26 (46) |
Domain 3: Data management and use, n/N (%) | ||||
Uses a registry to record consultations | Â | Â | Â | 30/34 (88) |
Reviews monthly data for trends | 26/35 (74) | Â | Â | Â |
Able to follow individual patients between registers (ex: laboratory and pharmacy registers) | 19/35 (54) | Â | Â | Â |
Able to map cases geographically | 24/35 (69) | Â | Â | Â |
Use data to make decisions (ex: community outreach, request assistance or commodities) | 25/35 (71) | Â | Â | 18/34 (53) |
Ever received guidance on how to interpret and use data | 9/35 (26) | Â | Â | Â |
Reviews registers for data quality | 33/35 (94) | Â | Â | Â |
Ever received guidance on how to assess data quality | 8/35 (23) | Â | Â | Â |
Performs active case detection or community level outreach in the event of outbreak | 2/35 (6) | Â | Â | Â |
Able to perform community outreach in the event of an outbreak | Â | Â | Â | 30/34 (88) |
Domain 4: Training, supervision, technical assistance, n/N (%) | ||||
Received malaria specific training | Â | 28/41 (68) | Â | Â |
Received malaria elimination training | Â | 6/41 (15) | Â | Â |
Received supervision vision in past 6Â months | 15/35 (43) | Â | Â | 20/34 (59) |
Received data management training in past 2Â years | 10/35 (29) | Â | Â | 19/34 (56) |
Data quality audit was performed in past year | 12/35 (34) | Â | Â | Â |
Reported ever receiving feedback on submitted data | 25/35 (71) | Â | Â | 9/34 (26) |
Received guidance on how to respond to an outbreak | 11/35 (31) | Â | Â | 17/34 (50) |