Skip to main content

Table 2 Number of mosquitoes identified into molecular forms of An. subpictus and An. sundaicus based on the rDNA (ITS2 and 28S-D2-D3) sequences and AS-PCR

From: Molecular forms of Anopheles subpictus and Anopheles sundaicus in the Indian subcontinent

Locality

Molecular forms

DNA sequencing

AS-PCRa

ITS2

28S-D2-D3

Nuh, India

An. subpictus Form A

4

4

86

Ranchi, India

An. subpictus Form A

63

19

15

Borio, India

An. subpictus Form A

2

2

10

Alwar, India

An. subpictus Form A

3

3

12

Jodhpur, India

An. subpictus Form A

2

7

7

Gadchiroli, India

An. subpictus Form A

4

4

25

Chilka, India

An. subpictus Form A

3

3

62

An. subpictus Form B

8

8

618

Goa, India

An. subpictus Form B

2

2

5

Puducherry, India

An. subpictus Form A

8

8

59

An. subpictus Form B

5

5

73

Sri Lanka

An. subpictus Form A

22

13

16

An. subpictus Form B

6

6

44

Portblair, A&N Island

An. subpictus Form C

5

5

ND

Carnicobar, A&N Island

An. subpictus Form C

5

5

ND

An. sundaicus D (variant IIIb)

12

12

ND

An. sundaicus (TK)

1

1

ND

Myanmar

An. epiroticus (variant Ib)

4

4

ND

  1. ND not done
  2. a Assignment of Form B or C of An. subpictus in a specific locality was done on the basis of molecular form present in the area as determined by DNA sequencing
  3. b Designation of variants as per Dusfour et al. [24]