Table 3 Receipt and use of ITN by study arm
Intervention (n = 510) | Control (n = 508) | Difference | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasarawa State, Nigeria | ||||
Self-reported ITN receipt and use | n (%) | n (%) | ||
Mother received ITN during pregnancy | 455 (89.2) | 505 (99.4) | − 10.2 | 0.100 |
Mother slept under ITN previous night | 372 (72.9) | 345 (67.9) | 5.0 | 0.197 |
Infant slept under ITN previous night | 422 (82.7) | 385 (75.8) | 6.9 | 0.023 |
Intervention (n = 211) | Control (n = 208) | Difference | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Kisumu County, Kenya | ||||
Self-reported ITN receipt and use | n (%) | n (%) | ||
Mother received ITN during pregnancy | 203 (96.7) | 188 (92.2) | 4.5 | 0.045 |
Mother slept under ITN previous night | 198 (99.5) | 191 (99.5) | 0 | 0.978 |
Infant slept under ITN previous night | 199 (94.3) | 197 (94.7) | − 0.4 | 0.858 |