Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary statistics for comparison of the number of mosquitoes of different species collected from walls, roofs and other surfaces inside the different house types, in Ulanga and Kilombero districts, south-eastern Tanzania

From: Preferred resting surfaces of dominant malaria vectors inside different house types in rural south-eastern Tanzania

House type

Resting surfaces

 

Mosquito species

 

Anopheles funestus

Anopheles arabiensis

Culex mosquitoes

Mean (95% CI)

RR (95% CI)

p value

Mean (95% CI)

RR (95% CI)

p value

Mean (95% CI)

RR (95% CI)

p value

Thatched roofs and mud walls

Walls

0.26 (0.08–0.90)

1.00

 

0.12 (0.05–0.29)

1.00

 

2.02 (0.70–5.80)

1.00

 

Roofs

0.71 (0.21–2.43)

2.72 (2.11–3.50)

0.001

0.23 (0.09–0.55)

1.93 (1.33–2.79)

0.001

3.56 (1.24–10.24)

1.77 (1.50–2.08)

0.001

Other surfaces

0.39 (0.11–1.34)

1.49 (1.14–1.94)

0.003

0.21 (0.08–0.50)

1.73 (1.20–2.51)

0.004

2.63 (0.91–7.57)

1.31 (1.11–1.54)

0.001

Thatched roofs and brick walls

Walls

0.63 (0.14–2.76)

1.00

 

0.15 (0.07–0.29)

1.00

 

3.58 (1.58–8.10)

1.00

 

Roofs

0.73 (0.17–3.23)

1.17 (0.94–1.45)

0.170

0.34 (0.18–0.64)

2.27 (2.27–2.28)

0.001

6.16 (2.73–13.92)

1.72 (1.37–2.16)

0.001

Other surfaces

1.02 (0.23–4.49)

1.63 (1.31–2.02)

0.001

0.29 (0.15–0.56)

1.97 (1.96–1.97)

0.001

4.16 (1.84–9.39)

1.16 (0.92–1.47)

0.210

Metal roofs and un-plastered brick walls

Walls

0.75 (0.27–2.11)

1.00

 

0.06 (0.02–0.16)

1.00

 

3.08 (1.16–8.19)

1.00

 

Roofs

0.32 (0.11–0.90)

0.42 (0.32–0.57)

0.001

0.02 (0.01–0.06)

0.29 (0.12–0.71)

0.007

1.56 (0.58–4.18)

0.51 (0.37–0.69)

0.001

Other surfaces

0.94 (0.33–2.63)

1.25 (0.96–1.63)

0.100

0.10 (0.04–0.25)

1.60 (0.93–2.78)

0.090

4.62 (1.74–12.2)

1.50 (1.15–1.97)

0.003

Metal roofs and plastered brick walls

Walls

0.15 (0.03–0.64)

1.00

 

–

–

–

1.75 (0.48–6.44)

1.00

 

Roofs

0.11 (0.02–0.47)

0.73 (0.50–1.07)

0.110

–

–

–

1.12 (0.30–4.11)

0.64 (0.48–0.83)

0.001

Other surfaces

0.28 (0.06–1.22)

1.92 (1.41–2.59)

0.001

–

–

–

3.48 (0.95–12.70)

1.98 (1.56–2.52)

0.001

  1. In the statistical analyses, the wall is considered reference, against which other surfaces are compared. The tables include model estimated mean catches per collection event per house per night. There were three collection events each night
  2. Very few An. arabiensis were caught in houses with metal roofs and plastered brick walls, it was not possible to fit GLMM model to An. arabiensis data