Skip to main content

Table 2 Detection of P. falciparum and diagnostic performance of the csRDT and the uRDT

From: Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia

 

n

TP

FP

TN

FN

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity %

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

DOR

Agreement (κ)

Detection of P. falciparum including non-falciparum species

 uRDT

270

31

2

110

127

19.6

(13.9–26.8)

98.2

(93.1–99.7)

93.9

(78.4–98.9)

46.4

(40.0–53.0)

13.4

(3.1–57.4)

0.15

(0.09–0.21)

 csRDT Pf-line

270

36

5

107

122

22.8

(16.7–30.3)

95.5

(89.4–98.3)

87.8

(73–95.4)

46.7

(79.8–88.8)

6.3

(2.4–16.7)

0.16

(0.09–0.23)

Detection of P. falciparum excluding non-falciparum species

 uRDT

242

31

2

82

127

19.6

(13.9–26.8)

97.6

(90.9–99.6)

93.9

(78.4–98.9)

39.2

(32.6–46.2)

10

(2.3–42.9)

0.13

(0.07–0.13)

 csRDT Pf-line

242

36

2

82

122

22.8

(16.7–30.3)

97.6

(90.9–99.6)

94.7

(80.9–99.1)

40.2

(33.5–47.3)

12.1

(2.8–51.6)

0.15

(0.09–0.15)

  1. n number of samples, TP True Positive, FP False positive, TN True Negative, FN False Negative, Sens sensitivity, Spec specificity, lowCI Lower 95% confidence Interval, UpperCI Upper 95% confidence interval, PPV Positive Predictive Value, NPV Negative Predictive Value, DOR Diagnostics odds ratio, k Kappa value