Skip to main content

Table 1 Deviation to WHO protocol and impact on treatment outcome

From: Is there evidence of anti-malarial multidrug resistance in Burkina Faso?

Study setting (Ref)

Study design (follow-up)

Study pop. (n)

ACT

Reported % ACPR

Deviation from WHO protocol

Impact on ACPR

Nouna health centre Aug–Oct 2011 [4]

RCT (28 days)

6–59 months (193)

ASAQ vs ASAQ + MB

85.1 vs 71.4

mITT analysis, ETF misclassification

Decrease

PCR correction with msp1 and msp2

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Nouna hospital. OctNov 2016 [5]

RCT (28 days)

6–59 months (100)

ASAQ + PQ vs ASAQ + MB

95.9 vs 95.7

ITT analysis

Decrease

PCR correction with msp1 and msp2

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Tiéfora and Mangodara health centres, Comoé Province. Sep–Dec 2009 [6]

Single arm (28 days)

6–59 months (105)

AL

90.5

PCR correction with msp2 only

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Tiéfora and Mangodara health centres, Comoé Province. Sep–Dec 2012 [7]

Single arm (28 days)

6–59 months (105)

AL

86.7

PCR correction with msp2 only

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Ouagadougou and Nanoro. 2012–2014 [8]

Multicentre, multicounty, single arm (28 and 42 days)

> 28 days and <5 kg (20)

AL

100 day 28-100 day 42a

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Colsama and Sakary health centres, Bobo-Dioulasso Jun–Dec 2016 [9]

RCT (28 days)

> 6 months (281)

AL vs ASAQ

85.2 vs 97.0

No PCR correction

Decrease

Nanoro health district Sep 2008-Jan 2010 [10]

RCT (28 and 42 days)

6–59 months (340)

AL vs ASAQ

89.8 vs 89.7 - day 28 66.7 vs 63.0 day 42

PCR correction with msp1 and msp2

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Unsupervised treatment

Decease

Nanoro health district Sep 2010-Oct 2012 [11,12,13]

RCT (28 days)

> 6 months (680)

AL vs ASAQ

77.8 vs 84.1

PCR correction with msp1 and msp2

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Unsupervised treatment

Decease

Dafra medical centre, Bobo-Dioulasso Dec 2008-Dec 2010 [14]

RCT (42 days)

6 months–15 years

(440)

AL vs ASAQ

91.1 vs 98.1

Longer follow-up

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Nanoro health district Jun 2010-Aug 2013 [15]

Multicentre, multicounty, RCT (63 days)

Pregnant women (802)

AL vs ASAQ vs ASMQ

93.2 vs 96.7 vs 92.5

Longer follow-up

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Balinghi. Oct 2010–Oct 2013 [6]

Multicentre, multicounty, RCT (63 days)

6–59 months (245)

AL vs ASMQ

95.9 vs 97.6

Danger sign classified ETF at day 1

Decrease

Longer follow-up

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Banfora Oct 2010–Oct 2013 [16]

Multicentre, multicounty, RCT (63 days)

6–59 months (115)

AL vs ASMQ

94.9 vs 91.2

Danger sign classified ETF at day 1

Decrease

Longer follow-up

Decrease

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Ouagadougou and Nanoro Nov 2013-Jun 2015 [17]

Multicentre, multicounty, RCT (42 days)

6–12 months (90)

DP different formulation

98:3 vs 100b

Re-infection classified as ACPR

Increase

Bobo Dioulasso and Banfora-Niangoloko Oct 2011–Feb 2016 [18]

Multicentre, multicounty, RCT (28 and 42 days)

> 6 months (1507)

AL vs ASAQ vs ASPY vs DP

> 99.5 day 28

98.6 day 42c

Re-infection classified ACPR if failure recorded on last day of follow-up

Increase

  1. RCT randomized controlled trial, ACT artemisinin-based combination therapy, AL artemether-lumefantrine, ASAQ artesunate-amodiaquine, ASPY artesunate-pyronaridine, ASMQ artesunate-mefloquine, DP dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, ACPR adequate clinical and parasitological response, mITT modified intent-to-treat, ITT intent-to-treat, ETF early treatment failure, PCR polymerase chain reaction, msp merozoite surface protein, P. Plasmodium
  2. aData from all sites in Burkina Faso and Benin
  3. bData from all sites in Burkina Faso, The Gambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Mozambique, Tanzania
  4. cData from all sites in Burkina Faso, Guinea and Mali and for all ACT