Skip to main content

Table 6 Reasons for preference

From: The use of respondent‑driven sampling to assess febrile illness treatment-seeking behaviours among forest-goers in Cambodia and Vietnam

  Cambodia Vietnam
Weighted population proportion [Bootstrapped 95% CI] Unweighted sample N Weighted population proportion [Bootstrapped 95% CI] Unweighted sample N
Top ranked reasons for place of preference
 Proximity 37.7 [32.7–43.1] 239 87.8 [84.2–91.0] 549
Second ranked reasons for place of preference
 Cost 36.5 [31.7–41.2] 208 68.0 [62.6–73.4] 417
Third ranked reasons for place of preference
 Availability of service 45.8 [39.4–52.2] 168
 Trust in provider 38.8 [32.8–44.9] 194 16.1 [12.4–20.0] 131
  1. [Refer to Additional file 1: Table S1 for complete table]