Skip to main content

Table 6 Reasons for preference

From: The use of respondent‑driven sampling to assess febrile illness treatment-seeking behaviours among forest-goers in Cambodia and Vietnam

 

Cambodia

Vietnam

Weighted population proportion [Bootstrapped 95% CI]

Unweighted sample N

Weighted population proportion [Bootstrapped 95% CI]

Unweighted sample N

Top ranked reasons for place of preference

 Proximity

37.7 [32.7–43.1]

239

87.8 [84.2–91.0]

549

Second ranked reasons for place of preference

 Cost

36.5 [31.7–41.2]

208

68.0 [62.6–73.4]

417

Third ranked reasons for place of preference

 Availability of service

45.8 [39.4–52.2]

168

 Trust in provider

38.8 [32.8–44.9]

194

16.1 [12.4–20.0]

131

  1. [Refer to Additional file 1: Table S1 for complete table]