Skip to main content

Table 8 Myanmar predicted external, internal, and financial motivation scores

From: Motivation to test, treat, and report malaria cases: a quantitative assessment among private sector providers in the Greater Mekong Subregion

 

External motivation

Internal motivation

Financial motivation

Provider characteristics

Overall

Overall mean score

0.000

0.001

− 0.002

SD

0.710

0.262

0.798

Min

− 1.971

− 1.207

− 0.579

Max

0.957

0.183

3.094

Gender

Female

− 0.021

− 0.004

0.037

Male

0.040

0.009

− 0.077

Provider type

AMTR

0.129

− 0.028

− 0.019

CHSP

− 0.116

0.026

0.014

SQH

n/a

n/a

n/a

Region

Yangon

n/a

n/a

n/a

Mandalay

0.111

− 0.066

0.402

Sagaing

− 0.607

0.072

− 0.437

Taninthar

0.410

0.064

− 0.028

Shan

0.353

0.109

0.400

Kachin

0.112

− 0.102

− 0.116

Chin

0.043

− 0.050

0.494

Education level

Monastery

0.191

0.037

0.040

High school

− 0.139

0.006

− 0.046

Higher education

− 0.150

− 0.103

0.000

Provider age

Regression coefficient

0.008 **

0.001 ns

− 0.003 ns

Outcomes

Attended PSI training

Yes

− 0.008

0.013

− 0.003

Not yet

0.127

− 0.192

0.017

How willing would you be to continue to keeping records and sharing them with the government?

Extremely unwilling

0.769

0.333

0.167

Not willing

− 0.110

− 0.022

− 0.042

Neutral

− 0.142

− 0.296

0.243

Willing

− 0.028

− 0.041

− 0.003

Extremely willing

0.051

0.078

− 0.037

Imagine that all of PSI’s support for your practice ended tomorrow. How would you …

I wouldn't restock

0.612

0.294

0.136

Receive from the government

0.206

− 0.080

− 0.375

Buy from another source

− 0.205

0.078

− 0.128

Other

0.092

0.028

0.060

Years in programme

Regression coefficient

0.027 ns

− 0.001 ns

− 0.015 ns

  1. Bold scores indicate significant difference within group at the 5% level (ANOVA); significance of regression coefficients = * = 5%; ** = 1%; *** < 0.1%