Table 3 The impact of malaria control interventions on self-reported malaria prevalence among women in the past 12 months
Intervention arm vs. Non-intervention arm | Impact estimates of the malaria interventions on self-reported malaria prevalence among women aged 15–49 years | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poisson regression model | Sensitivity analysis | |||||||
Binary logistic regression model | Probit regression model | Linear regression model | ||||||
ATE [95% CI] | P-value | ATE [95% CI] | P-value | ATE [95% CI] | P-value | ATE [95% CI] | P-value | |
Access to ITNs vs. No access to ITNs | − 7.05 [− 11.96, − 2.14] | 0.005 | − 7.88 [− 13.14, − 2.62] | 0.004 | − 7.16 [− 12.26, − 2.07] | 0.006 | − 7.39 [− 12.60, − 2.17] | 0.006 |
Household sprayed (IRS) vs. Household not sprayed | − 6.81 [− 13.06, − 0.55] | 0.033 | − 6.36 [− 13.03, 0.32] | 0.062 | − 7.34 [− 14.10, − 0.58] | 0.033 | − 5.99 [− 12.20, 0.23] | 0.059 |
Access to ITNs & IRS vs. Access to ITNs only | − 6.88 [− 14.69, 0.93] | 0.084 | − 6.83 [− 14.61, 0.94] | 0.085 | − 7.68 [− 15.63, 0.28] | 0.059 | − 6.41 [− 13.86, 1.03] | 0.091 |
Access to ITNs & IRS vs. Access to IRS only | − 4.70 [− 9.76, 0.37] | 0.068 | − 4.12 [− 8.15, − 0.09] | 0.045 | − 3.25 [− 7.09, 0.59] | 0.095 | − 19.08 [− 38.97, 0.80] | 0.060 |
Access to ITNs & IRS vs. No access to ITNs & IRS | − 27.09 [− 34.94, − 19.25] | < 0.001 | − 27.99 [− 35.58, − 20.41] | < 0.001 | − 28.66 [− 36.33, − 21.00] | < 0.001 | − 27.12 [− 35.62, − 18.63] | < 0.001 |