Table 1 The effect of the SR on the human biting rate (HBR) by Anopheles species presented only for species with non-sparse data
From: Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia
Anopheles Species | Location | SR median (min, max) | Placebo median (min, max) | % Change (95% CI) | Raw-p value | BH* adjusted p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aconitus | Indoor | 0 (0.43) | 0 (0.6) | 282.1 (59.2, 816.7) | 0.003 | 0.060 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.60) | 0 (0.4) | 140.0 (− 4.3, 502.0) | 0.062 | 0.413 | |
annularis | Indoor | 0 (0.8) | 0 (0.13) | 4.8 (− 64.1, 203.2) | 0.939 | 0.988 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.12) | 0 (0.16) | 52.8 (− 47.7, 346.3) | 0.438 | 0.674 | |
barbirostris | Indoor | 0 (0.3) | 0(0.10) | − 16.9 (− 75.0, 175.9) | 0.762 | 0.953 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.3) | 0 (0.7) | − 31.8 (− 78.7, 118.3) | 0.519 | 0.741 | |
flavirostris | Indoor | 0 (0.20) | 0 (0.10) | 36.7 (− 31.3, 171.8) | 0.373 | 0.622 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.28) | 0 (0.10) | 46.4 (− 26.0, 189.4) | 0.273 | 0.840 | |
kochi | Indoor | 0 (0.6) | 0 (0.26) | − 14.0 (− 76.4, 213.5) | 0.820 | 0.496 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.4) | 0 (0.40) | − 26.5 (− 79.0, 156.8) | 0.630 | 0.965 | |
leucophyrus | Indoor | 0 (0.1) | 0 (0.1) | − 93.2 (− 99.90, 352.2) | 0.210 | 0.420 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.1) | 0 (0.3) | − 97.9 (− 100.0, 89.1) | 0.093 | 0.310 | |
maculatus | Indoor | 0 (0.12) | 0 (0.4) | 112.7 (17.1, 286.4) | 0.013 | 0.130 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.14) | 0 (0.3) | 68.7 (− 5.7, 201.8) | 0.078 | 0.312 | |
sundaicus | Indoor | 0 (0.15) | 0 (0.8) | − 83.8 (− 97.8, 16.9) | 0.071 | 0.355 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.18) | 0 (0.5) | − 77.7 (− 97.0, 64.8) | 0.141 | 0.353 | |
tessellatus | Indoor | 0 (0.9) | 0 (0.47) | 3.9 (− 89.7, 949.2) | 0.974 | 0.974 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.6) | 0 (0.42) | 9.7 (− 89.3, 1021.3) | 0.937 | 1.000 | |
vagus | Indoor | 0 (0.16) | 0 (0.47) | 100.5 (− 26.2, 444.8) | 0.173 | 0.384 |
Outdoor | 0 (0.10) | 0 (0.37) | 113.9 (− 21.3, 481.4) | 0.136 | 0.389 |