Skip to main content

Table 2 The effect of per-species HBR on PE against overall malaria infections

From: Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia

Anopheles species

Collection location

PE difference* (%)

95% CI

Raw 2-sided p-value

BH# adjusted p-value

aconitus

Indoor

− 4.19

− 9.10, 0.73

0.095

0.136

Outdoor

− 5.90

− 10.85, − 0.97

0.019

0.057

Indoor + outdoor

− 6.75

− 11.52, − 1.95

0.006

0.026

annularis

Indoor

− 6.00

− 11.46, 0.48

0.033

0.090

Outdoor

− 0.92

− 6.50, 4.65

0.744

0.797

Indoor + outdoor

− 4.43

− 9.37, 0.52

0.079

0.125

barbirostris

Indoor

− 5.7

− 11.63, 0.26

0.061

0.102

Outdoor

− 6.15

− 12.55, 0.22

0.058

0.102

Indoor + outdoor

− 15.18

− 29.50, − 0.88

0.038

0.088

flavirostris

Indoor

− 1.95

− 6.80, 2.94

0.438

0.505

Outdoor

− 2.78

− 7.73, 2.24

0.278

0.348

Indoor + outdoor

− 3.43

− 8.57, 1.70

0.188

0.245

kochi

Indoor

− 8.88

− 15.24, − 2.50

0.006

0.023

Outdoor

− 9.04

− 16.1, − 1.95

0.012

0.036

Indoor + outdoor

− 6.20

− 12.15, − 0.26

0.04

0.086

leucosphyrus

Indoor

− 14.57

− 31.16, 2.08

0.086

0.129

Outdoor

− 6.15

− 24.87, 12.52

0.519

0.577

Indoor + outdoor

− 9.91

− 22.55, 2.69

0.124

0.169

maculatus

Indoor

− 7.78

− 12.96, − 2.55

0.004

0.02

Outdoor

− 10.51

− 15.37, − 5.60

 < 0.0001

 < 0.003

Indoor + outdoor

− 9.17

− 14.03, − 4.77

 < 0.0001

 < 0.003

sundaicus

Indoor

6.89

0.13, 13.61

0.046

0.086

Outdoor

7.19

0.43, 13.96

0.037

0.093

Indoor + outdoor

5.84

0.17, 11.53

0.044

0.088

tessellatus

Indoor

− 8.2

− 13.49, − 2.92

0.002

0.02

Outdoor

− 4.19

− 6.91, − 1.55

0.002

0.015

Indoor + outdoor

− 7.88

− 12.73, − 3.01

0.002

0.012

vagus

Indoor

0.39

− 4.48, 5.27

0.876

0.906

Outdoor

− 2.14

− 7.42, 3.10

0.421

0.505

Indoor + outdoor

0.17

− 4.62, 4.96

0.944

0.944

  1. *Benjamini–Hochberg multiplicity adjustment procedure
  2. #The PE differences are only approximate (based on first-order Taylor Expansion)
  3. The interpretation is as follow: if a HBR increases by e1–1 = 1.72-folds, then the PE of SR again overall malaria infection changes by PE difference %