Table 7 The effect of the SR on the HBR (bpn) of non-Anopheles mosquitoes
From: Impact of a spatial repellent product on Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes in Sumba, Indonesia
Species | Location | (Mean ± SD) | % Reduction (SR vs. placebo) (95% Cl) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SR | Placebo | ||||
All | Indoor | 4.33 ± 7.45 | 7.27 ± 9.26 | 43.1 (− 2.2, 68.3) | 0.0589 |
Outdoor | 4.29 ± 6.25 | 6.59 ± 8.35 | 38.7 (− 10.1, 65.8) | 0.1015 | |
Aedes sp. | Indoor | 0.86 ± 2.17 | 1.09 ± 1.91 | 44.3 (1.5, 67.0) | 0.0443 |
Outdoor | 0.86 ± 2.21 | 0.99 ± 1.87 | 35.6 (− 14.6, 63.8) | 0.1348 | |
Armigeres sp. | Indoor | 0.55 ± 1.48 | 0.90 ± 2.41 | 38.3 (− 37.2, 72.2) | 0.2365 |
Outdoor | 0.13 ± 1.39 | 0.85 ± 2.26 | 39.1 (− 34.0, 72.3) | 0.2178 | |
Culex sp. | Indoor | 2.88 ± 6.30 | 1.23 ± 8.34 | 36.0 (− 58.2, 74.1) | 0.3336 |
Outdoor | 2.87 ± 5.09 | 4.72 ± 7.46 | 32.3 (− 67.4, 72.6) | 0.3986 | |
Others | Indoor | 0.034 ± 0.269 | 0.038 ± 0.302 | NA* | NA* |
Outdoor | 0.030 ± 0.196 | 0.037 ± 0.309 | NA* | NA* | |