No. | Area of study | Dominant anophelines | Relative efficacy: Ratio to HLC (95% confidence intervals) | Was trap efficacy dependent on mosquito density? | References | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. CDC-LT | ||||||||
i. Mosquito species | ||||||||
1 | Ulanga, Tanzania | An. arabiensis An. funestus | 0.35 (0.27–0.46) 0.63 (0.51–0.79) | Yes Yes | This study | |||
2 | Ulanga, Tanzania | 98% An. gambiae s.l 2% An. funestus | 0.33 (0.24–0.46) 0.82 (0.61–1.10) | Not assessed | Okumu et al. 2008 [59] | |||
3 | Kenya, Zambia, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Tanzania | An. gambiae s.l An. funestus | 1.06 (0.68–1.64) 1.37 (0.70–2.68) | Yes Yes | Briët et al. 2015 [15] | |||
4 | Lwanda, Kenya | 74% An. gambiae s.l 26% An. funestus | 1.86 (1.73–2.00) 1.91 (1.66–2.19) | No No | Mathenge et al. 2004 [60] | |||
5 | Ahero, Kenya | An. arabiensis An. funestus | 0.56 (0.49–0.66) 1.19 (1.03–1.37) | Yes Yes | Mathenge et al. 2005 [30] | |||
6 | Rarieda, Kenya | An. gambiae s.l An. funestus | 1.18 (0.55–2.54) 0.69 (0.49–0.98) | Not assessed | Wong et al. 2013 [20] | |||
ii. ITNs vs. no ITNs | ||||||||
 |  |  | With ITNs | Without ITNs |  |  | ||
7 | Bo, Sierra Leone | An. gambiae s.l | 0.88 (0.72–1.05) | 0.78 (0.60–1.01) | No (without ITNs) Yes (with ITNs) | Magbity et al. 2002 [27]*†| ||
iii. Indoors vs. outdoors | ||||||||
 |  |  | Indoors | Outdoors |  |  | ||
8 | Wosera, Papua New Guinea | An. koliensis An. panctulatus An. karwari An. farauti s.l An. longirostris An. bancroftii | 0.28 (0.27–0.29) 0.10 (0.09–0.11) 0.12 (0.11–0.13) 0.07 (0.06–0.09) 0.12 (0.08–0.15) 0.20 (0.15–0.27) | 0.27 (0.26–0.28) 0.09 (0.08–0.09) 0.12 (0.11–0.13) 0.06 (0.05–0.08) 0.07 (0.05–1.05) 0.15 (0.11–0.20) | Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes | Hii et al. 2000 [58] | ||
9 | Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea | An. gambiae s.s & An. melas | 0.12 (0.11–0.14) (Mongola area) 0.36 (0.32–0.40) (Arena Blanca area) 0.13 (0.10–0.16) (Riaba area) | 0.009 (0.01–0.012) (Mongola area) 0.10 (0.09–0.12) (Arena Blanca area) 0.07 (0.05–0.09) (Riaba area) | Yes (indoors) No (outdoors) Yes Yes | Overgaard et al. 2012 [55]* | ||
iv. Location | ||||||||
 |  |  | Kakola-Ombaka area | Masogo area |  |  | ||
10 | Nyando & Muhoroni, Kenya | An. arabiensis An. funestus An. coustani | 1.98 (1.01–3.86) 0.88 (0.37–2.11) 3.03 (1.65–5.56) | 1.83 (0.70–4.79) 0.45 (0.13–1.57) 2.88 (1.15–7.22) | Not assessed | Abong’o et al. 2021 [32] | ||
B. HDT | ||||||||
1 | Ulanga, Tanzania | An. arabiensis An. funestus | 0.04 (0.01–0.14) 0.10 (0.07–0.15) | Yes Yes | This study | |||
i. Type of host bait | ||||||||
 |  | Cow-baited | Human-baited |  |  | |||
2 | Kisumu & Homa Bay, Kenya | An. gambiae s.s & An. arabiesnsis & An. funestus & An. coustani | 7.08 (Kisian) 8.34 (Homa Bay) | 0.17 (Kisian) 0.60 (Homa Bay) | Not assessed | Abong’o et al. 2018 [35]* | ||
ii. Location | ||||||||
 |  |  | Kakola-Ombaka area | Masogo area |  |  | ||
3 | Nyando & Muhoroni, Kenya | An. arabiensis An. funestus An. coustani An. pharoensis | 5.69 (2.98–10.86) 1.38 (0.60–3.18) 0 18(0.09–0.37) NA | 1.32 (0.49–3.59) 0.66 (0.21–2.09) 2.88 (1.15–7.22) NA | Not assessed | Abong’o et al. 2021 [32] | ||
 |  |  | Lakkang area | Pucak area |  |  | ||
4 | Chikwawa, Malawi | An. gambiae s.s & An. Arabiensis & An. coustani & An. quadriannulatus & An. tenebrosus | 1.03 (0.80–1.30) | 0.83–3.17) | Not assessed | Zembere et al. 2021 [33]* | ||
iii. Season | ||||||||
 |  |  | Rainy season | Early dry season | Late dry season |  |  | |
5 | Vallée de Kou, Burkina Faso | An. gambiae An. pharoensis An. coustani | 9.6 (9.4–9.7) 10.5 (10.4–10.7) NA | 2.2 (2.0–2.4) 2.8 (2.5–3.0) 18.6 (18.2–19.1) | 1.7 (1.3–2.0) 1.7 (1.3–2.1) NA | Not assessed | Hawkes et al. 2017 [31] |