Scenario | Description of assumptions |
---|---|
Best case | - Minor donor support to retail sector, workplace partnerships & GMF in Y1-Y2 post-project; - Support moves to NMCP or self-financing from GMF funds in Y3-Y5; - Optimistic but feasible growth each year in household purchase of LLINs with add-on features from retail sources; - Increase of 20% each year in workplace partner contributions; - Public investments to the GMF from % of DACF (0.5% in Y1-Y3, 0.75% in Y4, 1.0% in Y5); - Match funding initiative in Y3, with private investments matched 1:1 by donor funding; - Private investments to the GMF start in Y3 and increase by 10% each year (corporate & individual fundraising) |
Very good case | - Minor donor support to retail sector, workplace partnerships & GMF in Y1-Y2 post-project; - Support moves to NMCP or self-financing from GMF funds in Y3-Y5; - Conservative growth each year in household purchase of LLINs with add-on features from retail sources; - Increase of 15% each year in workplace partner contributions; - Public investments to the GMF from % of DACF (0.5% in Y1-Y5); - Match funding initiative in Y3, with private investments matched 1:1 by donor funding - Private investments to the GMF start in Y3 and increase by 5% each year (corporate & individual fundraising) |
Good case | - Minor donor support to GMF in Y1-Y2 post-project; self-financing from GMF funds in Y3-Y5; - No donor support for retail sector or workplace partnerships; - Minimal growth each year in household purchase of LLINs with add-on features from retail sources; - Increase of 10% each year in workplace partner contributions; - Public investments to the GMF from % of DACF (0% in Y1-Y2, 0.25% in Y3, 0.5% in Y4-Y5); - Match funding initiative in Y3, with private investments matched 1:1 by donor funding - Private investments to the GMF start in Y3 and increase by 2.5% each year (corporate & individual fundraising) |
Poor case | - Minor donor support to GMF in Y1-Y2 post-project; self-financing from GMF funds in Y3-Y5; - No donor support for retail sector or workplace partnerships; - Household purchase of LLINs with add-on features from retail sources remains at same level as final year of project (no growth); - Workplace partner contributions remain same level as final year of project (no growth); - No public investments to the GMF from % of DACF; - Match funding initiative in Y3, with private investments matched 1:1 by donor funding - Private investments to the GMF start in Y3, remain constant in Y4-Y5 (corporate & individual fundraising) |
Worst case | - No donor support for retail sector, workplace partnerships or GMF; - Household purchase of LLINs with add-on features from retail sources remains at same level as final year of project (no growth); - Workplace partner contributions remain same level as final year of project (no growth); - No public investments to the GMF from % of DACF; - No private investments to the GMF (corporate & individual fundraising) or match funding |