Skip to main content

Table 1 Random-effect Meta-Analysis

From: Which trap is best? Alternatives to outdoor human landing catches for malaria vector surveillance: a meta-analysis

n

Hedge’s g

95% Confidence Interval

τ2

I2

58

 − 0.8544

[− 1.751, 0.0562]

10.6943

98.3%

  1. Results reveal that there is no statistically significant difference between alternative trapping methods and HLC in terms of total Anopheles collected
Back to article page

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us