Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup Analysis using ‘Type’

From: Which trap is best? Alternatives to outdoor human landing catches for malaria vector surveillance: a meta-analysis

 

n

Hedge’s g

95% confidence interval

Τ2

I2

Tent

17

− 0.4805

[− 0.9065, − 0.0544]

0.5766

88.9%

Light

17

− 2.4770

[− 5.7332, 0.7792]

38.8561

98.8%

Other—Passive

14

− 0.0650

[− 0.6150, 0.4851]

0.8245

96.4%

Other—Mechanical

9

 − 0.2083

[− 1.2493, 0.8327]

1.7961

98.3%

  1. Subgroup analysis shows that tent traps capture significantly more Anopheles mosquitoes than other trap types. Only one electrocuting trap study was included in this, so it was removed for analysis