Skip to main content

Table 4 Subgroup Analysis using ‘Africa’

From: Which trap is best? Alternatives to outdoor human landing catches for malaria vector surveillance: a meta-analysis

 

n

Hedge’s g

95% confidence interval

Τ2

I2

Studies not in Africa

20

0.1748

[− 0.3243, 0.6738]

1.0598

96.5%

Studies performed in Africa

38

− 1.4268

[− 2.8095, − 0.0440]

16.3656

98.2%

  1. Subgroup analysis shows that alternative trapping methods performed in Africa capture significantly more Anopheles mosquitoes than HLC
Back to article page

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us