Skip to main content

Table 5 Subgroup analysis using ‘Species’

From: Which trap is best? Alternatives to outdoor human landing catches for malaria vector surveillance: a meta-analysis

 

n

Hedge’s g

95% confidence interval

Τ2

I2

An. gambiae complex

23

 − 2.3543

[− 4.4613, − 0.2473]

22.2930

97.7%

An. funestus group

11

0.5875

[− 1.1705, 2.3455]

6.6345

99.0%

Anopheles spp.

24

 − 0.1930

[− 0.7835, 0.3975]

1.8459

97.2%

  1. Subgroup analysis shows that alternative trapping methods capture significantly more Anopheles gambiae than HLC
Back to article page

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us