From: Screening eaves of houses reduces indoor mosquito density in rural, western Kenya
Collection location | Category | Mosquito species | Intervention status | Mosquito numbers | Mean (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indoors | Female | Anopheles funestus | Screened | 219 | 0.47 (0.34–0.60) | 0.40 (0.29–0.55) | < 0.001 |
Unscreened | 593 | 1.34 (0.94–1.74) | Ref |  | |||
Anopheles gambiae | Screened | 202 | 0.43 (0.31–0.56) | 0.46 (0.34–0.62) | < 0.001 | ||
Unscreened | 403 | 0.91 (0.72–1.10) | Ref |  | |||
Culex species | Screened | 4256 | 9.13 (7.55–10.72) | 0.53 (0.45–0.61) | < 0.001 | ||
Unscreened | 7128 | 16.09 (13.80–18.38) | Ref |  | |||
Male | Anopheles funestus | Screened | 260 | 0.56 (0.28–0.84) | 0.37 (0.26–0.53) | < 0.001 | |
Unscreened | 478 | 1.08 (0.82–1.34) | Ref |  | |||
Anopheles gambiae | Screened | 175 | 0.38 (0.21–0.54) | 0.40 (0.28–0.57) | < 0.001 | ||
Unscreened | 341 | 0.77 (0.59–0.95) | Ref |  | |||
Culex species | Screened | 4573 | 9.81 (7.67–11.95) | 0.36 (0.30–0.43) | < 0.001 | ||
Unscreened | 10,265 | 23.17 (19.70–26.65) | Ref |  | |||
Outdoors | Female | Anopheles funestus | Screened | 123 | 0.27 (0.18–0.35) | 1.08 (0.72–1.63) | 0.70 |
Unscreened | 105 | 0.24 (0.12–0.37) | Ref |  | |||
Anopheles gambiae | Screened | 418 | 0.91 (0.72–1.09) | 1.23 (0.94–1.62) | 0.13 | ||
Unscreened | 347 | 0.80 (0.58–1.02) | Ref |  | |||
Culex species | Screened | 1867 | 4.05 (3.40–4.69) | 1.11 (0.90–1.37) | 0.33 | ||
Unscreened | 1438 | 3.31 (2.77–3.86) | Ref |  | |||
Male | Anopheles funestus | Screened | 204 | 0.44 (0.29–0.60) | 1.59 (1.00–2.53) | 0.05 | |
Unscreened | 90 | 0.21 (0.14–0.28) | Ref |  | |||
Anopheles gambiae | Screened | 308 | 0.67 (0.51–0.82) | 1.09 (0.79–1.51) | 0.58 | ||
Unscreened | 301 | 0.69 (0.49–0.89) | Ref |  | |||
Culex species | Screened | 2196 | 4.76 (4.00–5.53) | 1.10 (0.87–1.39) | 0.42 | ||
Unscreened | 1712 | 3.94 (3.26–4.63) | Ref |  |