From: Impact of different mosquito collection methods on indicators of Anopheles malaria vectors in Uganda
Collection method | Vector density | DR (95% CI) | P value | Sporozoite rate | RR (95% CI) | P value | aEIR | IRR (95% CI) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indoor | |||||||||
 HLC | 4.24 | Reference | – | 0.015 | Reference | – | 22.81 | Reference | – |
 CDC LT | 2.96 | 0.70 (0.63–0.77) |  < 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.82 (0.34–1.96) | 0.66 | 13.08 | 0.57 (0.24–1.37) | 0.21 |
 Prokopack | 1.82 | 0.43 (0.37–0.49) |  < 0.001 | 0.017 | 1.17 (0.38–3.58) | 0.79 | 11.41 | 0.50 (0.16–1.55) | 0.23 |
Outdoor | |||||||||
 HLC | 3.53 | Reference | – | 0.018 | Reference | – | 22.81 | Reference | – |
 Pit trap | 6.43 | 1.82 (1.61–2.05) |  < 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.23 (0.07–0.75) | 0.008 | 9.51 | 0.42 (0.13–1.37) | 0.15 |