Skip to main content

Table 3 Measures of association between method of collection and vector density, stratified by species

From: Impact of different mosquito collection methods on indicators of Anopheles malaria vectors in Uganda

 

Anopheles gambiae s.s

Anopheles arabiensis

Anopheles funestus

Vector density

DR (95% CI)

P value

Vector density

DR (95% CI)

P value

Vector density

DR (95% CI)

P value

Indoor

 HLC

0.77

Reference

–

2.11

Reference

–

1.09

Reference

–

 CDC LT

0.92

1.19 (0.94–1.52)

0.14

0.94

0.44 (0.38–0.52)

 < 0.001

1.03

0.94 (0.77–1.15)

0.55

 Prokopack

0.31

0.40 (0.28–0.56)

 < 0.001

0.14

0.06 (0.04–0.10)

 < 0.001

1.36

1.25 (0.99–1.56)

0.06

Outdoor

 HLC

0.65

Reference

–

1.30

Reference

–

1.22

Reference

–

 Pit trap

0.26

0.40 (0.27–0.57)

 < 0.001

5.42

4.16 (3.46–5.01)

 < 0.001

0.64

0.53 (0.41–0.68)

 < 0.001