Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy of microscopy and RDT using qPCR as reference

From: Accuracy of diagnosis among clinical malaria patients: comparing microscopy, RDT and a highly sensitive quantitative PCR looking at the implications for submicroscopic infections

Performance metric

Test

RDT

Microscopy

TP (qPCR = 438)

244

172

FP (qPCR negative)

11

10

TN (qPCR = 602)

591

592

FN (qPCR positive)

194

266

Sensitivity % (95% C.I.)

55.7 (51.0–60.3)

39.3 (34.8–43.9)

Specificity % (95% C.I.)

98.2 (96.8–99.0)

98.3 (97.0–99.1)

PPV % (95% C.I.)

95.7 (92.4–97.6)

94.5 (90.2–97.0)

NPV % (95% C.I.)

75.3 (72.2–78.2)

69.0 (65.8–72.0)

Accuracy %

80.3

73.5

kappa value (95% C.I.)

0.571 (0.523–0.620)

0.409 (0.359–0.458)

  1. TP True Positive, FP False Positive, FN False Negative, TN True Negative, PPV Positive Predictive Value, NPV Negative Predictive Value