Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of methods on the percent of outcomes classified as new infections (n = 139).

From: The use of genotyping in antimalarial clinical trials: a systematic review of published studies from 1995–2005

Explanatory Variable

Univariate Analysis

Multivariate Analysis

OR* (95% CI)

p-value

OR* (95% CI)

p-value

Number of markers

    

   ≥3 markers vs. 1–2 markers

1· 09 (0.56–2· 13)

0.80

1· 28 (0.45–3· 65)

0.64

Classification of mixed results

    

   not always recrudescence vs. always recrudescence

1· 92 (0.91–4· 03)

0.09

3· 31 (1· 22–9· 01)

0.02

Treatment group

    

   artemisinin combination therapy vs. monotherapy

8· 20 (3· 52–19· 11)

< 0.0001

8· 56 (3· 34–21· 94)

< 0.0001

   non-artemisinin combination therapy vs. monotherapy

2· 72 (1· 03–7· 16)

0.04

2· 30 (0.82–6· 47)

0.12

Geographic region

    

   Africa vs. rest of the world

0.87 (0.44–1· 71)

0.68

3· 30 (1· 01–10.84)

0.05

Maximum duration of follow-up

    

   > 28 days vs. ≤ 28 days

2· 54 (1· 23–5· 24)

0.01

4.10 (1· 28–13· 15)

0.02

  1. * Odds Ratio for the outcome defined as: ≥ 50% of samples successfully genotyped were classified as new infections
  2. Mixed results defined as a sample from the day of recurrent parasitaemia containing both alleles present in the baseline sample and new alleles not present in the baseline sample