Skip to main content

Table 4 Prevalence of fever, healthcare utilization, and malaria among children in Zambézia Province and across three focus districts

From: Prevalence and determinants of malaria among children in Zambézia Province, Mozambique

 

All Province

Alto Molócuè

Morrumbala

Namacurra

p value*

(n = 2540)

(n = 781)

(n = 522)

(n = 416)

Fever in the past 30 days

    

<0.001

 Missing, n (%)

39 (2)

24 (3)

4 (1)

1 (<1)

 

 No (%)

56.6

53.6

61.6

50.6

 

 Yes (%)

43.4

46.4

38.4

49.4

 

Sought advice or treatment for the fever (if fever)

72.5%

78.4%

79.2%

69.6%

0.47

Source of medical care (if sought advice)

    

<0.001

 Missing, n (%)

269 (25)

75 (21)

49 (23)

56 (28)

 

 Family member (%)

2.8

7.6

3.0

0.0

 

 Health facility (%)

91.3

87.1

86.0

93.1

 

 Other (%)

1.1

2.0

3.1

1.1

 

 Pharmacy (%)

0.1

0.8

0.0

2.1

 

 Traditional healer (%)

4.7

2.5

8.0

3.8

 

Malaria diagnostic performed (if health facility)

     

Rapid diagnostic test (RDT)

    

0.003

 Missing, n (%)

19 (3)

14 (6)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

 No (%)

34.5

25.8

32.5

35.0

 

 Yes (%)

65.5

74.2

67.5

65.0

 

Blood smear

    

0.025

 Missing, n (%)

27 (4)

17 (7)

1 (1)

2 (2)

 

 No (%)

41.4

32.0

35.0

41.1

 

 Yes (%)

58.6

68.0

65.0

58.9

 

Either RDT or smear

    

0.003

 Missing, n (%)

19 (3)

14 (6)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

 No (%)

33.4

24.2

28.6

34.4

 

 Yes (%)

66.6

75.8

71.4

65.6

 

Positive test result for malaria (if test performed)

    

0.18

 Missing, n (%)

4 (1)

1 (1)

0 (0)

2 (2)

 

 No (%)

32.7

33.6

30.4

19.6

 

 Yes (%)

67.3

66.4

69.6

80.4

 

Estimated prevalence of malaria

12.8%

15.9%

13.6%

16.8%

<0.001

  1. Continuous variables are reported as weighted estimates of median (interquartile range), with each observation being weighted by the inverse of the child sampling probability
  2. Categorical variables are reported as weighted percentages, with each observation being weighted by the inverse of the child sampling probability
  3. * Chi square tests comparing across three focus districts. p values ignore effects of clustering