Skip to main content

Table 3 Staff involvement in, and training and supervision on case investigation and classification (Survey)

From: Performance and feasibility of reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Vietnam: a mixed-methods study

Information on case investigation

Health stakeholders/staff

FHSPs

Total

Involvement in case investigation, n (%)

 Yes, always

-na-

19 (50.0)

19 (50.0)

 Yes, sometimes

-na-

16 (42.1)

16 (42.1)

 No, never

-na-

3 (7.9)

3 (7.9)

Willingness to be involved in case investigation in future among FHSP who sometimes or never involved in case investigation* (n = 19), n (%)

 Yes

-na-

13 (68.4)

13 (68.4)

 No

-na-

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Missing

-na-

6(31.6)

6(31.6)

Responsible person for performing case investigation, n (%)

 Village health workers (VHWs) or equivalent

7 (19.4)

-na-

7 (19.4)

 Others

29 (80.6)

-na-

29 (80.6)

Specific person in the malaria programme who is responsible for overseeing case investigations, n (%)

 Yes

34 (94.4)

-na-

34 (94.4)

 No

2 (5.6)

-na-

2 (5.6)

Responsible person was trained in case investigation techniques, n (%)

 Yes

32 (91.4)

27 (77.1)

59 (84.3)

 No

2 (5.7)

8 (22.9)

10 (14.3)

 Don’t know

1 (2.9)

0 (0)

1 (1.4)

Frequency of the training relating to case investigation, n (%)

 Monthly

3 (8.6)

5 (15.6)

8 (11.9)

 Quarterly

4 (11.4)

2 (6.3)

6 (9.0)

 Yearly

20 (57.1)

2 (6.3)

22 (32.8)

 Every second year

8 (22.9)

23 (71.9)

31 (46.3)

Being supervised for conducting case investigation, n (%)

 Yes

33 (94.3)

32 (86.5)

65 (90.3)

 No

2 (5.7)

5 (13.5)

7 (9.7)

Frequency of supervision for personnel conducting case investigations, n (%)

 Monthly

6 (16.7)

15 (41.7)

21 (29.2)

 Quarterly

18 (50.0)

4 (11.1)

22 (30.6)

 Yearly

5 (13.9)

8 (22.2)

13 (18.1)

 Others

7 (19.4)

9 (25.0)

16 (22.2)