Open Access

A potential threat to malaria elimination: extensive deltamethrin and DDT resistance to Anopheles sinensis from the malaria-endemic areas in China

  • Duo-quan Wang1,
  • Zhi-gui Xia1Email author,
  • Shui-sen Zhou1,
  • Xiao-nong Zhou1,
  • Ru-bo Wang1 and
  • Qing-feng Zhang1
Malaria Journal201312:164

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-164

Received: 4 April 2013

Accepted: 7 May 2013

Published: 17 May 2013

Abstract

Background

Insecticide resistance in malaria vectors is a growing concern in many countries and requires immediate attention because of the limited chemical arsenal available for vector control. There is lack of systematic and standard monitoring data of malaria vector resistance in the endemic areas, which is essential for the ambitious goal of malaria elimination programme of China.

Methods

In 2010, eight provinces from different malaria endemic region were selected for study areas. Bioassays were performed on F1 progeny of Anopheles sinensis reared from wild-caught females using the standard WHO susceptibility test with diagnostic concentrations of 0.25% deltamethrin and 4% DDT.

Results

For An. sinensis, the results indicated that exposure to 0.25% deltamethrin of F1 families with mortalities ranging from 5.96% to 64.54% and less than 80% mortality to DDT at the diagnostic concentration of 4% across the study areas.

Conclusions

Anopheles sinensis was completely resistant to both deltamethrin and DDT, and resistance to pyrethroid has risen strikingly compared to that recorded during 1990s. The results highlight the importance of longitudinal insecticide resistance monitoring and the urgent need for a better understanding of the status of insecticide resistance in this region.

Keywords

Insecticide resistance An. sinensis Malaria-endemic areas

Background

The use of pyrethroid insecticides in malaria vector control has increased dramatically in the past decade through the scale up of insecticide treated net distribution programmes and indoor residual spraying campaigns [1]. The ambitious goal of malaria elimination programme of China launched in July 2010 and planned to be completed by 2020. However, malaria is still an important disease in some area. Vector control has played an essential role in the reduction of malaria in the regions and is still indispensable to control malaria in endemic foci [2]. The available vector control methods rely on the use of insecticides for bed net impregnation or indoor spraying. Consequently, development of insecticide resistance may jeopardize the vector control efforts. Hence, knowledge of vector resistance and trends in target areas are basic requirements to guide insecticide use for malaria elimination. With the prevalence and severity of resistance to DDT in several Anopheles species, pyrethroids remain the only insecticides authorized by WHO for extensive use on malaria elimination campaigns [3]. The exploitation of pyrethroids in China started from 1970s, and the application of this new type of insecticide has flourished in recent years. Since 1997, insecticide production in China has been over 3.9×108kg and application around 2.5×108 kg per annum. The area treated with pyrethroids occupies more than one third of the total insecticide-treated area in China [4].

Anopheles sinensis, Anopheles lesteri, Anopheles minimus s.l. and Anopheles dirus s.l. are the four main malaria vectors in China. The most widely distributed and extensively investigated malaria vector is An. sinensis, and the areas where vector insecticide resistance monitoring has been carried out since the 1990s are located mainly in the eastern and southern provinces. In contrast, there is lack of the systematic, comprehensive and standard monitoring data of malaria vector resistance in recent years, especially from the malaria endemic areas [5].

Methods

Study area

Eight provinces from different malaria endemic regions were selected for study (Figure 1). One county in each province, two or three sentinel sites in each county were chosen for the survey. In the selected county, the sites were chosen to encompass a range of insecticide selection pressures including an urban site with local use of insecticides in subsistence agriculture, a rural site with high coverage of insecticide-based malaria control interventions and a site with less insecticide usage.
Figure 1

The sentinel sites in this study.

Sampling collection

From August to October in 2010, adult mosquitoes were collected by different collection methods (indoor and outdoor human landing collection, collection on cattle and morning resting collections inside houses) in sentinel sites. Female mosquitoes collected from the field were identified morphologically using taxonomic keys [6]. All samples in each county were pooled and raised together to the F1 families,1-3 day old adult females were used for the insecticide bioassay.

Resistance tests

Two insecticides were tested: 0.25% deltamethrin and 4% DDT. Insecticide papers were obtained from the WHO reference centre in Malaysia [7]. Each batch was tested on the insecticide susceptible Jiangsu strain of Anopheles at the key laboratory in National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention before dispatch to the participant provinces. Any batches of papers showing less than 100% mortality in these control tests were discarded. Each paper was used a maximum of six times. About 100 mosquitoes (3–5 replicates of approximately 25 mosquitoes, with tests performed over more than one day) were exposed to each insecticide for 1 hour. Mortality was recorded 24 hours after exposure. Each day a control was tested alongside the exposure tubes. The bioassay result was corrected using the Abbott formula when the control mortality was between 5 and 20%. The bioassay results were summarized in three resistance classes as defined by WHO: (1) susceptible when mortality was 98% or higher, (2) possible resistant when mortality was between 97 and 80%, and (3) resistant when the mortality was lower than 80% [8].

Ethical considerations

We have obtained ethics approval from National Institute of Parasitic Disease, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Who Collaborating Center for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis) ethical committee and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. No specific permissions were required for these activities, the location is not privately-owned and the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.

Results

The An. sinensis reference strain from Jiangsu was susceptible to all insecticides, showing 100% mortality at WHO recommended discriminating dosages. Mortality in control groups was consistently below 5%, and no correction was required.

Exposure to 0.25% deltamethrin of F1 families indicated obvious resistance in eight provinces with mortalities ranging from 5.96% to 64.54% across the study regions. There was a significant difference of mortality; the highest percentage of mosquitoes surviving the WHO diagnostic doses was seen in the agricultural districts of Guangshui County in Hubei Province, while the lowest was recorded of Minshan County in Sichuan Province.

Similarly, a high frequency of DDT resistant individuals was also observed in Hubei Province (9.29% mortality), Jiangxi Province (10.72% mortality) and Hunan Province (23.67% mortality). All the An. sinensis population collected in the study region showed less than 80% mortality to DDT and was thus defined as resistant at the diagnostic concentration of 4%.

Above all, the results of standard WHO susceptibility tests against adults reared from wild collected in eight provinces during 2010 adults showed An. sinensis were completely resistant to both deltamethrin and DDT in the study areas (Table 1).
Table 1

WHO insecticide susceptibility test results on 1–3 day old F1 An. sinensis reared from females collected from the study area in 2010

Province

County

Deltamethrin (0.25% w/v)a

Resistance statusb

DDT (4%w/v)a

Resistance statusb

Total(n)

(%) mort

95% CI

 

Total(n)

(%) mort

95% CI

 

Hubei

Guangshui

102

5.96

6.04~5.88

R

97

9.29

9.25~9.33

R

Henan

Yongcheng

108

20.35

20.47~20.23

R

    

Hunan

Heshan

107

28.57

28.89~28.25

R

101

23.67

23.52~23.82

R

Jiangsu

Sihong

96

35.72

35.79~35.65

R

106

47.62

47.42~47.82

R

Jiangxi

Jinxian

107

12.35

12.40~12.30

R

102

10.72

10.64~10.80

R

Sichuan

Minshan

92

64.54

57.82~57.18

R

    

Shanghai

Songjiang

80

57.5

64.84~64.24

R

120

73.61

73.31~73.91

R

Yunnan

Ninger

100

45.84

45.96~45.72

R

88

52.28

52.22~52.34

R

Susceptible reference strain

107

100.00

 

S

101

100.00

  

Results expressed as % mortality 24 hr post exposure.

aWHO diagnostic concentration . bS = susceptible; R = resistant.

Discussion

Extensive deltamethrin and DDT resistance in An. sinensis from malaria-endemic areas which showed a good agreement in mortality rate

Based on the WHO criteria for characterizing insecticide resistance/susceptibility, the populations of An. sinensis from the study areas were high resistant to both deltamethrin and DDT, and the most important finding in this study was the good correlation in mortality rate between deltamethrin and DDT at the diagnostic concentration, the lower mortality rate of deltamethrin with lower mortality rate of DDT, which indicated a good agreement between the resistance to deltamethrin and that to DDT in the tested population (Figure 2). This agrees with several recent studies completed in Anhui [9], Hainan [10], Hubei [11] and Jiangsu [12] provinces, where the mortality of An. sinensis to DDT and deltamethrin were both below 60% at the same diagnostic concentration from 2006 to 2010. It is well known that knockdown resistance (kdr) is a type of target-site resistance arising from point mutations in the sodium channel genes of the insect nervous system to confer cross-resistance to DDT and pyrethroids [13]. Similar observations of resistance in populations of Anopheles arabiensis to DDT and deltamethrin had also been reported from Sudan [14] and Ethiopia [15]. This study confirms that switching from DDT to deltamethrin can only be a short term strategy, since resistance to both insecticides will increase.
Figure 2

The relationship between the mortality of DDT and that of deltamethrin in An. sinensis population.

Although malaria mosquitoes have not been treated with DDT for many years in China, obvious resistance to DDT still exists in mosquito populations. For An. sinensis, resistance to DDT was found to be ubiquitous during 1990s: eighty-nine percent of 27 regions in five provinces exhibited obvious or elementary resistance. The problem in Hubei and Yunnan province was quite striking [5]. Similarly, this present large-scale survey also indicates that DDT resistance still exists in the malaria-endemic areas, while An. sinensis is completely resistant to DDT in the study sites. The level of DDT resistance has possibly been increased by the agricultural and domestic use of deltamethrin [16], through the sodium channel genes [13] as well as its resistance can be inherited [5].

For An. sinensis, deltamethrin and permethrin are the major pyrethroid insecticides, and the monitoring data recorded during 1990s in China showed elementary resistance or sensitivity to these two insecticides in most of the regions investigated [5], and the occurrence of initial resistance during the 2000s has been reported in some areas, while obvious resistance was ubiquitous of in recent years [1722]. The resistance to deltamethrin has risen significantly in the malaria-endemic areas compared to those in the 1990s.

Moreover, almost all studies had been accomplished during 1990s using the modified criteria for Chinese case which were far below [21] that initiated and standardized by the WHO in the mid-1980s. Since 2000, most related studies have been completed using WHO standard at the same time. When the diagnostic concentration was considered, the resistance to deltamethrin has risen more seriously than the collected data indicating.

Since pyrethroids have been extensively used in recent years, the area treated with pyrethroids occupies more than one third of the total insecticide-treated area in China. For the public health market, pyrethroids are used as indoor sprays or incense, or to impregnate bed nets, curtains and screens. Many highly efficient, non-toxic pyrethroids are applied extensively in agriculture and public sanitation, such as deltamethrin, permethrin, methothrin, resmethrin and cyhalothrin.

Therefore, it is not surprising that An. sinensis resistance to deltamethrin has risen quickly from 1990–2010, and this large-scale survey further indicated that pyrethroids resistance in An. sinensis was developing quickly during these twenty years, though the surveys covered eight provinces that vary substantially in geography, economic and social environmental changes, there was unanimous agreement among the result that high level of resistance against the two insecticides existing in all survey sites with most of the population showing mortality lower than 65%. Excessive use of agricultural pesticides may be blamed for causing such insecticide resistance increase during these years.

Since pyrethroid resistance mainly results from agricultural applications, it is likely that such resistance will evolve regardless of the organized use of pyrethroids in properly managed malaria control campaigns. Even if pyrethroid resistance is a serious threat to vector control, it would be dangerous to extrapolate from these results alone before the geographical extent of the resistance and its impact on the protective effect of impregnated bed nets has been determined.

Vector control is an essential component of malaria control programmes. The WHO has reaffirmed the importance of vector control through indoor residual spraying (IRS) as one of the primary interventions for reducing or interrupting malaria transmission in both stable and unstable transmission zones. Though resistance does not necessarily result in failure to control disease, sufficient attention should be paid to pyrethroid resistance in malaria vectors either from endemic or no endemic areas in China, since the integrated approach to vector control is one of the key integral components for its malaria elimination programme. Even an integrated approach to vector control has frequently been advocated [2325]. Although the need for a reduced reliance on insecticides for vector-borne disease control has been stressed further by the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety, Forum VI [26], in fact various studies predicted that combinations of interventions can be much more effective in reducing malaria transmission than individual interventions and that the effect of IRS and ITNs is amplified by environmental management, even in areas of intense transmission [27, 28]. Besides its direct effect on transmission intensity, the integration of methods may also contribute to resistance management. For example, larval control is expected to prevent or delay the onset of vector resistance to insecticides [29], whereas measures that reduce human contact with vectors, such as good housing conditions or presence of repellents, will reduce the selection pressure.

Operationally in China, it is urgent to set up networks to systematically and continuously monitor the resistance levels and follow their evolution among major Anopheles mosquitoes to main insecticides, especially in areas where vector control operations are planned for the malaria elimination programme. It is also important to strengthen basic and operational research to clarify the resistance mechanisms and evaluate the impact of resistance on the efficacy of insecticide-based vector control measures in the field, so that rational insecticide choice can be made and the successful contribution of vector control to malaria elimination could be ensured.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Hubei CDC, Hunan CDC, Henan CDC, Jiangxi CDC, Sichuan CDC, Shanghai CDC, Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases and Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases for their excellent cooperation. The work was supported financially by Global Fund Project in China.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO Collaborating Centre for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis; Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Health

References

  1. Ranson H, N’guessan R, Lines J, Moiroux N, Nkuni Z, Corbel V: Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: what are the implications for malaria control?. Trends Parasitol. 2011, 2: 91-98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Van Bortel W, Trung HD, Thuan le K, Sochantha T, Socheat D, Sumrandee C, Baimai V, Keokenchanh K, Samlane P, Roelants P, Denis L, Verhaeghen K, Obsomer V, Coosemans M: The insecticide resistance status of malaria vectors in the Mekong region. Malar J. 2008, 7: 102-10.1186/1475-2875-7-102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hemingway J, Bates I: Malaria: past problems and future prospects. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4: S29-S31. 10.1038/sj.embor.embor841.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hua X-M, Shan Z-J: [The production and application of pesticides and factor analysis of their pollution in environment in China](in Chinese). Adv Environ Sci. 1996, 4: 33-45.Google Scholar
  5. Cui F, Raymond M, Qiao CL: Insecticide resistance in vector mosquitoes in China. Pest Manag Sci. 2006, 62: 1013-1022. 10.1002/ps.1288.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ministry of Health Disease Prevention and Control Bureau: Handbook for malaria control and prevention. 2007, Beijing: People’s Hygiene Publishing House PressGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO: Supplies for monitoring insecticide resistance in disease vectors. Parasitic Diseases and Vector Control (PVC) Communicable Disease Control, Prevention and Eradication (CPE). WHO/CDS/CPE/PVC/2001.2. 2002, Geneva, Switzerland,http://www.malariajournal.com/content/8/1/208,Google Scholar
  8. WHO: Report of the WHO informal consultation. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vectors, bio-efficacy and persistence of insecticides on treated surfaces. 1998, Geneva: World Health Organization, WHO/CDS/CPC/MAL/98.12Google Scholar
  9. Song W, Ma E-J, Qun L: [Resistance of Anopheles sinensis to deltamethrin in three counties of Hefei city] (in Chinese). Chin J Vec Biol Contr. 2012, 23: 216-217.Google Scholar
  10. Zeng LH, Wang SQ, Sun DW, Zhao W, Li SG, Yang X: [Resistance assay of malaria vectors to four kinds of common insecticides in some endemic areas of Hainan Province] (in Chinese). Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2011, 29: 200-203.Google Scholar
  11. Yu PH, Hu LQ, Liu LY, Huang GQ, Zhang HX, Chen H, Zhang C, Pei SJ: [The field investigation on the resistance of Anopheles in Jingshan, Anlu and Xiaochang of Hubei province](in Chinese). Chin J Vector Biol Contr. 2008, 19: 500-502.Google Scholar
  12. Li JL, Zhou HY, Cao J, Zhu GD, Wang WM, Gu Y, Liu Y, Cao Y, Zhang C, Gao Q: [Sensitivity of Anopheles sinensis to insecticides in Jiangsu Province](in Chinese). Chin J Schistosomiasis Contr. 2011, 23: 296-300.Google Scholar
  13. Soderlund DM, Knipple DC: The molecular biology of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticide. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003, 33: 563-577. 10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00023-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abdalla H, Matambo TS, Koekemoer LL: Insecticide susceptibility and vector status of natural populations of Anopheles arabiensis from Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 102: 263-271. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Martinez-Torres D, Foster SP, Field LM, Devonshire AL, Williamson MS: A sodium channel point mutation is associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroid insecticides in the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insect Mol Biol. 1999, 8: 339-346. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1999.83121.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chandre F, Darrier F, Manga L: Status of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato. Bull World Health Organ. 1999, 77: 230-234.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin L-F, Xu H-Z, Zhang Z-H: [Studies on insecticide resistant status and countermeasure of vectors of public health importance and its application in Guangdong Province](in Chinese). Chin J Vector Biol Contr. 2000, 11: 340-344.Google Scholar
  18. Pei SJ, Li KJ, Hu LQ: [Field survey of resistance of Anopheles sinensis to deltamethrin in Hubei Province](in Chinese). China Tropical Medicine. 2010, 10: 792-793.Google Scholar
  19. Yu PH, Zhang HX, Zhang SQ, Xu BZ: [Survey of susceptibility of Anopheline vectors to insecticides in malaria mesoendemic area, Hubei Province](in Chinese). Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2000, 18: 149-151.Google Scholar
  20. Zhou HY, Li JL, Jin XL, Wang WM, Zhu GD, Gu YP, Cao J, Gao Q: [Surveillance on Resistance of Anopheles Vectors to Pyrethroid in Jiangsu Province](in Chinese). Chin J Schistosomiasis Contr. 2004, 16: 199-201.Google Scholar
  21. Pan B, Zhu TH, Liu YY, Wu WG: [The main malaria vectors resistance to insecticide in China](in Chinese). Chin J Vector Biol Contr. 2001, 12: 145-148.Google Scholar
  22. Tan Y, Zhou WN, Zhou JG, Wang HB: [Rapid detection on the susceptibility of Anophelines to pyrethroids used in the impregnation of bed nets in Napo County, Guangxi](in Chinese). Chin J Parasitic Dis Contr. 2002, 15: 249-250.Google Scholar
  23. McKenzie FE, Baird JK, Beier JC, Lal AA, Bossert WH: A biological basis for integrated malaria control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 571-577.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Shiff C: Integrated approach to malaria control. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002, 15: 278-293. 10.1128/CMR.15.2.278-293.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Utzinger J, Tanner M, Kammen DM, Killeen GF, Singer BH: Integrated programme is key to malaria control. Nature. 2002, 419: 431-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety: Sixth session of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety. 2008, Final Report, 2008. Available: http://www.who.int/ifcs/documents/forums/forum6/f6_finalreport_en.pdf [accessed 23 September 2009]Google Scholar
  27. Killeen GF, McKenzie FE, Foy BD, Schieffelin C, Billingsley PF, Beier JC: The potential impact of integrated malaria transmission control on entomologic inoculation rate in highly endemic areas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 62: 545-551.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Killeen GF, Seyoum A, Knols BG: Rationalizing historical successes of malaria control in Africa in terms of mosquito resource availability management. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2004, 71 (suppl 2): 87-93.Google Scholar
  29. Walker K, Lynch M: Contributions of Anopheles larval control to malaria suppression in tropical Africa: review of achievements and potential. Med Vet Entomol. 2007, 21: 2-21. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00674.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement