Open Access

Malaria incidence and efficacy of intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi)

  • Robin Kobbe1,
  • Samuel Adjei1, 2,
  • Christina Kreuzberg1,
  • Benno Kreuels1,
  • Benedicta Thompson3,
  • Peter A Thompson3,
  • Florian Marks1, 4,
  • Wibke Busch1,
  • Meral Tosun1,
  • Nadine Schreiber1,
  • Ernest Opoku3,
  • Ohene Adjei3,
  • Christian G Meyer5 and
  • Juergen May1Email author
Malaria Journal20076:163

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-163

Received: 31 July 2007

Accepted: 09 December 2007

Published: 09 December 2007

Abstract

Background

Intermittent preventive antimalarial treatment in infants (IPTi) is currently evaluated as a malaria control strategy. Among the factors influencing the extent of protection that is provided by IPTi are the transmission intensity, seasonality, drug resistance patterns, and the schedule of IPTi administrations. The aim of this study was to determine how far the protective efficacy of IPTi depends on spatio-temporal variations of the prevailing incidence of malaria.

Methods

One thousand seventy infants were enrolled in a registered controlled trial on the efficacy of IPTi with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in the Ashanti Region, Ghana, West Africa (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT00206739). Stratification for the village of residence and the month of birth of study participants demonstrated that the malaria incidence was dependent on spatial (range of incidence rates in different villages 0.6–2.0 episodes/year) and temporal (range of incidence rates in children of different birth months 0.8–1.2 episodes/year) factors. The range of spatio-temporal variation allowed ecological analyses of the correlation between malaria incidence rates, anti-Plasmodium falciparum lysate IgG antibody levels and protective efficacies provided by IPTi.

Results

Protective efficacy of the first SP administration was positively correlated with malaria incidences in children living in a distinct village or born in a distinct month (R2 0.48, p < 0.04 and R2 0.63, p < 0.003, respectively). Corresponding trends were seen after the second and third study drug administration. Accordingly, IgG levels against parasite lysate increased with malaria incidence. This correlation was stronger in children who received IPTi, indicating an effect modification of the intervention.

Conclusion

The spatial and temporal variations of malaria incidences in a geographically and meteorologically homogeneous study area exemplify the need for close monitoring of local incidence rates in all types of intervention studies. The increase of the protective efficacy of IPTi with malaria incidences may be relevant for IPTi implementation strategies and, possibly, for other malaria control measures.

Background

Effective antimalarial control strategies for young children in Africa must urgently be improved, as this group is at highest risk of morbidity and mortality due to Plasmodium falciparum malaria [1, 2]. In most parts of sub-Saharan Africa, individual control measures concentrate on the reduction of parasite transmission through insecticide-treated bed nets and treatment of acute malaria episodes [3], the latter often being inappropriate due to increasing parasite drug resistance [4, 5]. In addition to established control measures [6], novel approaches comprise pre-erythrocytic stage vaccines and the concept of "intermittent preventive treatment in infants" (IPTi) [7, 8].

IPTi essentially exerts therapeutic and prophylactic effects of antimalarial drugs administered at intervals short enough to prevent disease, but long enough to allow for the development of protective immunity [9]. However, the exact mechanisms of protection are still not clear. It has been assumed that an optimal drug application schedule depends on the half-life of the antimalarial drugs used, the extent of current parasite drug-resistance, the transmission intensity, and the incidence of malaria episodes [10].

The IPTi application schedule that was originally evaluated in Tanzania was based on weight-adapted single-dose sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and was pragmatically linked to the expanded programme on immunization (EPI) recommended by WHO, with vaccinations at months 2, 3 and 9 [8]. In that study, IPTi was 59% effective in reducing malaria episodes in an area with an incidence rate (IR) of 0.43 per person-year. In subsequent trials performed in Northern Ghana and Mozambique, protective efficacies were 24.8% (IR 1.02) and 22.2% (IR 0.55), respectively [11, 12]. So far, studies modelling the impact of the malaria incidence on the protection that is provided by IPTi are not available.

The linear regression model presented here makes use of data of a recent controlled trial on SP-based IPTi performed in Ghana. The overall protective efficacy in this trial was 20.3% (IR 1.20) and decreased with the age of study participants [13]. The study presented here aims to determine the influence of spatio-temporally different malaria incidences on the efficacy of IPTi with SP in an ecological analysis.

Methods

Study area

The trial was conducted from January 2003 to September 2005 in the Ashanti Region, Ghana, West Africa, in nine neighboring villages of the rural Afigya Sekyere district. The district occupies an area of 714 km2 in the forest belt. Geographically, the study area is homogeneous [14]. All distances between villages are < 15 km with altitude levels between 300 and 500 metres above the sea level. Temperature varies between 20.4°C and 33.5°C while monthly rainfall ranges from 15 mm (January) to 214 mm (June) with similar fluctuation in all villages. The area is holoendemic for P. falciparum malaria with perennial transmission and seasonal peaks (high transmission from May to October) [15]. Malaria vectors are mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex and Anopheles funestus. The peak entomological inoculation rate (EIR) of P. falciparum is > 100 infectious bites per individual in October. While chloroquine was the first-line drug for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ghana at the beginnning of the study, the Ghana Health Services has recommended a three-day regimen of amodiaquine-artesunate since March 2003. Plasmodium falciparum resistance against chloroquine and SP in the study area is high [16].

Study design

One-thousand seventy infants at the age of three months (tolerance of four weeks accepted) with permanent residence in one of the villages under survey were recruited throughout the year 2003 [13]. In average 89 infants (range 59–110) were enrolled monthly and randomized to receive either a single-dose of 250 mg sulphadoxine and 12.5 mg pyrimethamine or placebo (verum drug and placebo provided by Roche, Basel, Switzerland). IPTi-treatment doses were given at the age of 3, 9 and 15 months (IPTi-1, IPTi-2, IPTi-3, respectively). Monthly follow-up visits were made over a period of 21 months until the age of 24 months. A structured questionnaire and a physical examination were completed and documented on each consultation. Clinical malaria episodes were defined as events of fever (rectal body temperature ≥ 38.0°C or fever reported to have occurred during the preceding 48 h) together with asexual P. falciparum parasitaemia (> 500 parasites/μl).

Examination of blood films followed quality-controlled standardized procedures. Briefly, films where air-dried, Giemsa-stained and independently read twice by two laboratory technicians by light microscopy. Parasitaemia levels were determined by scoring the number of asexual stage parasites per 200 leukocytes. If less than 10 parasites per 200 leukocytes were counted, the parasitaemia level was related to 500 leukocytes. Parasite densities were converted to the number of parasites per μL of blood, assuming 8,000 leukocytes/μL. Blood films were read again in case of ambiguities of parasite positivity/negativity, parasitaemia levels (ratio > 3), or of the parasite species. The final parasitaemia used for further statistical analyses was the median parasitaemia of all readings that were rated positive.

IgG antibody levels against crude P. falciparum lysate were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in all participants who completed follow-up as described in detail previously [17]. The parasite lysate fraction used as antigen was prepared from cultures of infected erythrocytes isolated from children with severe malaria living in the same malaria endemic region and results were expressed in Relative Units (RU) of IgG antibody levels.

Ethical considerations

Before enrolment of participants written or thumb-printed (in the presence of an unbiased witness) parental consent was obtained. All clinical investigations within the core study were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Committee of Human Research, Publications and Ethics, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. The trial was registered at Clinical Trial Registration System with the number NCT00206739.

Statistical analysis

Data from structured questionnaires and forms were entered within five days after each visit into a database (4th Dimension, Paris, France). Data were cross-checked by a study physician before files were locked. All information on participants and their parents was strictly confidential. Copies of all data and the original source documents were retained. Analyses were performed with the STATA/SE software, version 9.2 (College Station, TX, USA).

Malaria incidence rates were calculated for children of the placebo group for the period of one year, beginning at the time of recruitment. Children were not rated at risk for malaria for 21 days after preceding malaria episodes or after antimalarial treatment. Protective efficacy was calculated for the period beginning at recruitment and ending three months after IPTi-3, or, for time stratification, for periods of six months after each SP administration. Protective efficacy against multiple malaria episodes was determined by Poisson regression and defined as one minus rate ratio.

Time-dependency of protective efficacy was assessed by tests on violation of proportional hazards assumptions which were graphically displayed in log-minus-log plots for each category of a nominal covariate versus log(analysis time) and formally tested by Schoenfeld residuals [18]. A multivariate Poisson regression model with time-dependent covariates defined by six-months periods after each IPTi dose was generated, and effect modification of protective efficacy with time strata was evaluated by log-likelihood tests.

Malaria incidence rates and protective efficacies were stratified for the month of birth and the village of residence of participants. Incidence rates were plotted against the protective efficacy or against IgG antibody levels of the same stratum and the unweighted regression coefficient was calculated.

Results

Basic data

The age distribution, sex ratio, number of parasitaemic infants at recruitment and the extent of bed net usage did not differ significantly between the treatment and the placebo group (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of study participants

Characteristic

Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine

n = 535

Placebo

n = 535

p†

Sex, no.

   

   Male

264 (49.3%)

272 (50.8%)

0.63

   Female

271 (50.7%)

263 (49.2%)

 

Age in weeks at recruitment, mean (SD)

   

   Age at IPTi-1*

12.3 (± 1.7)

12.3 (± 1.6)

0.85

Use of bednets, no.

   

   Yes

210 (39.3%)

201 (37.6%)

 

   No

261 (48.8%)

263 (49.2%)

0.75

   Missing data

64 (12.0%)

71 (13.3%)

 

P. falciparum parasitaemia at recruitment, no.

   

   Positive

72 (13.5%)

86 (16.1%)

 

   Negative

463 (86.5%)

448 (83.8%)

0.29

   Missing data

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.2%)

 

SD, standard deviation.

* Age at IPTi-1 is equal to age at time of recruitment.

† By Wilcoxon or χ2 test, none of the parameters in both study arms was significantly different.

Malaria incidence and date of birth

During the first year of the follow-up period, incidence rates (IR) of malaria were influenced by the month of birth of children (Figure 1A). IR was highest among children born in February (IR 1.2 episodes/year, 95% CI 0.9–1.7) and tended to decrease in children born during the second half of the year. The lowest malaria IR was observed in children born in November (IR 0.8 episodes/year, 95% CI 0.6–1.1).
Figure 1

Stratified malaria incidence rates. Malaria incidence rates per PYAR in the placebo group assessed over the period of one year, beginning at the time of recruitment. A, PYAR stratified for the month of birth of the children; B, PYAR stratified for the village of residence of the children. PYAR, person year at risk.

Malaria incidence and village of residence

During the first year of follow-up visits, IRs were strongly dependent on the village of residence (Kruskall-Wallis test p < 0.001) (Figure 1B). The highest IR of 2.0 episodes/year (95% CI 1.5–2.7) was observed in the village Afamanaso, and the lowest IR of 0.6 episodes/year (95% CI 0.4–0.8) was found in Jamasi.

IPTi schedule and protective efficacy of IPTi

Tests on the assessment of the proportional hazards assumption indicated that the protective efficacy of IPTi was dependent on the age of children at the time of IPTi application. First, vertical differences on log-minus-log survival plots for treatment and placebo tended to be higher in the first half of the observation period. Second, the plots of Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the observed data and the predicted Cox curves deviated considerably in the first year of the observation period in both groups. Third, Schoenfeld residuals provided evidence for violation of the proportional hazards assumption (rho 0.17, p = 0.007).

The evidence for violation of the proportional hazards assumption indicates that protective efficacies depend on the age of participating children at the time of of IPTi administration. Accordingly, analyses of the impact of IRs on protective efficacies were stratified for periods of six months after IPTi-1, IPTi-2 and IPTi-3 [13]. IPTi-1 administered at month 3 was more efficacious [23% protective efficacy (CI 6%–36%)] than IPTi-2 administered at nine months of age [17% (CI 1%–31%)] and IPTi-3 administered at 15 months of age [-5% (CI -25%–11%)].

Malaria incidences and protective efficacies

After stratification for the month of birth, the protective efficacies of IPTi-1 and IPTi-3 correlated significantly with the IRs (R2 0.63, p < 0.003 and R2 0.37, p < 0.04, respectively) (Figure 2A). A trend of a corresponding correlation was observed after IPTi-2 (R2 0.29, p = 0.07). In accordance to the results obtained for the month of birth, protective efficacies correlated significantly with IRs after stratification for the villages of residence. This applied to the efficacy of IPTi-1 (R2 0.48, p < 0.04) and, as a tendency, to that of IPTi-2 (R2 0.33, p = 0.11) (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Malaria incidence rates and protective efficacy. Correlation between the protective efficacy of each IPTi application during six months after the drug administration (blue circles and line, after IPTi-1; red diamonds and line, after IPTi-2; green triangles and line, after IPTi-3) and malaria incidence rates per PYAR for the same time periods in the placebo arm. A, stratified by month of birth (IPTi-1, R2 0.63, p < 0.003; IPTi-2, R2 0.29, p = 0.07; IPTi-3, R2 0.37, p < 0.04); B, stratified by village of residence (IPTi-1, R2 0.48, p < 0.04; IPTi-2, R2 0.33, p = 0.11; IPTi-3, R2 0.04, p = 0.60). PYAR, person year at risk.

Malaria incidence and IgG antibody levels

In children who received SP, mean IgG antibody responses against crude parasite lysate increased strongly with malaria IR in the same stratum (stratified by month of birth, R2 0.54, p < 0.006; stratified by village, R2 0.90, p < 0.001) (Figure 3A, B). In the placebo arm, this correlation was weaker than in children who received SP indicating an effect modification (stratified by month of birth, R2 0.05, p = 0.475; stratified by village, R2 0.89, p < 0.001). In contrast, the slope of malaria IR in the SP arm was lower (stratified by month of birth, slope 0.07, p < 0.80; stratified by village, slope 0.67, p < 0.007) than in the placebo group demonstrating the increase of protective efficacy with IR (Figure 3C, D). The Wald test for this interaction was significant for villages of residence (p < 0.001) and showed a similar trend when stratifying for the months of birth (p = 0.118) (Figure 4A, B).
Figure 3

Malaria incidence rates and anti-P. falciparum lysate IgG levels I. Panel A and B, correlation between the mean of anti-P. falciparum lysate IgG levels and malaria incidence rates in the placebo arm. A, stratified by month of birth (red diamonds and lines [linear regression, R2 0.54, p < 0.006], children from the SP arm; blue circles and lines [linear regression R2 0.05, p = 0.475], children from the placebo arm. B, stratified by village of residence (red diamonds and lines [linear regression, R2 0.90, p < 0.001], children from the SP arm; blue circles and lines [linear regression, R2 0.89, p < 0.001], children from the placebo arm). Panel C and D, correlation between malaria incidence rates and incidence rates in the placebo arm. C, stratified by month of birth (red diamonds and lines [slope 0.07, p < 0.80], children from the SP arm; blue circles and lines, children from the placebo arm as comparison [slope 1]). D, stratified by village of residence (red diamonds and lines [slope 0.67, p < 0.007], children from the SP arm; blue circles and lines, children from the placebo arm as comparison [slope 1]). PYAR, person year at risk.

Figure 4

Malaria incidence rates and anti-P. falciparum lysate IgG levels II. Correlation between the mean of anti-P. falciparum lysate IgG levels and malaria incidence rates of the respective study arm in each village. A, stratified by month of birth (Wald test, p = 0.118). B, stratified by village of residence (Wald test, p < 0.001). Blue circles and lines (linear regression), children from placebo arm; red diamonds and lines (linear regression), children from SP arm. PYAR, person year at risk.

Discussion

The data from the ecological analysis show that the extent of protection provided by IPTi increased almost linearly with the malaria incidence. This applied to spatial and temporal stratifications. The strongest correlation between IPTi efficacy and malaria incidence was observed after IPTi-1, namely during the period of six months when treatment was most efficacious, but the correlation still held after IPTi-2 and, to a certain extent, after IPTi-3 as well.

Protective efficacy is a relative measure that is independent of incidences. Therefore, a higher malaria incidence per se cannot explain a higher protective efficacy. An appealing explanation for the observation that the protective efficacy of IPTi increased with the malaria incidence could be the additional influence of acquired immunity, which is also dependent on the incidence of malaria. Indeed, the level of anti-P. falciparum IgG, which may be considered a measure of exposure [19], increased in both treatment arms with the number of clinical malaria attacks. In addition, IgG levels were non-proportionally elevated in children who received SP in villages with higher malaria incidences. Although the crude anti-P. falciparum IgG level is only a weak proxy measure for acquired anti-malaria immunity, it reflects the cumulative parasitological challenge and, indirectly, the extent of semi-protective immunity [17, 1921].

According to the findings reported here, spatial differences of the in vivo efficacy of antimalarial treatment have previously been described from Uganda [22], where the efficacy of SP, in combination with other antimalarial compounds, also increased with transmission intensity, indicating a strong influence of immunity on treatment response.

Not consistent with the observation of a positive correlation between malaria incidences and IPTi-mediated protective efficacies is the fact that, in the aforementioned study from Tanzania, the relative protective efficacy was, with 59%, higher than that in our study, although the malaria incidence was, with 0.43 per person per year, lower [8]. This inconsistency may result from varying degrees of SP drug resistance, differences in the usage of insecticide-treated bed nets, and variations of the study protocols, such as other drug application schedules and case-finding strategies [23]. The absolute reduction of the number of malaria episodes was almost identical in the Tanzanian trial, but also in that from northern Ghana and in the study presented here (incidence rate reduction 0.26, 0.25 and 0.26 episodes per year, respectively) [8, 11, 13]. An exception was the trial from Mozambique, where the absolute episode reduction was, with an annual incidence rate reduction of 0.11 episodes, lower [12].

Although the geographical locations, altitudes and climatic conditions of villages were largely homogeneous throughout the study area, a number of parasite and host-dependent factors might account for the micro-epidemiological differences between neighbouring villages observed here [14]. High variation of malaria transmission intensities with regard to season and geography are known to occur across Africa [24]. In contrast, inter-village differences of malaria incidences have only rarely been studied [25], although mathematical modelling has identified environmental heterogeneity as a pivotal factor for the implementation of malaria control programmes and the development of immunity [2628].

In this study, infants born in November were given drugs in February during the low-transmission season. The association of seasonal malaria incidences with protective efficacy of IPTi may explain why in areas of high seasonal transmission the administration of antimalarials was most effective at times of intense malaria transmission [29]. Supporting evidence comes from the IPTi study in northern Ghana where transmission is highly seasonal and children received four doses of SP at times of routine EPI vaccinations [11]. Although overall protection against clinical malaria was below 25% in that study, a subgroup of children who received first and second IPTi doses during the high transmission season were protected by more than 50%.

Conclusion

The data presented here indicates that the efficacy of IPTi crucially depends on the differential spatial and temporal malaria incidence. This observation has implications on implementation strategies of IPTi and, most likely, also on other malaria control measures. More generally, the data show that even in an apparently homogeneous study area, considerable variation may exist, which may have an impact on the outcome of intervention studies. Cost-effectiveness analyses and mathematical models should consider the dependency of malaria incidences on efficacy and control interventions should be adapted to the wide range of transmission conditions [3032]. Since efficient control measures will reduce malaria incidences, control measures must constantly be adapted to maintain their protective efficacy. The development and application of appropriate tools, such as satellite information and broad coverage of communication of relevant geographical, meteorological and micro-epidemiological data should be enforced in order to predict malaria dynamics and support the choice of appropriate control measures.

Abbreviations

C: 

Celsius

CI: 

Confidence Interval

EIR: 

entomological inoculation rate

ELISA: 

linked immunosorbent assays

EPI: 

expanded program on immunization

IgG: 

immunglobuline G

IPTi: 

intermittent preventive treatment in infants

IPTi-1: 

SP treatment given at the age of 3 months

IPTi-2: 

SP treatment given at the age of 9 months

IPTi-3: 

SP treatment given at the age of 15 months

IR: 

malaria incidence rate

km: 

kilometre

mg: 

milligram

mm: 

millimetre

μl: 

microlitre

RU: 

Relative Units

R2

correlation coefficient

SP: 

sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the participating children and their parents and guardians. The study was supported by a grant of the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). R.K., S.A., C.K., and I.L. received grants provided by the German Foreign Exchange service (DAAD).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine
(2)
Ministry of Health/Ghana Health Service District Health Directorate
(3)
Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine
(4)
International Vaccine Institute
(5)
Dept. Molecular Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine

References

  1. Snow RW, Guerra CA, Noor AM, Myint HY, Hay SI: The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2005, 434: 214-217. 10.1038/nature03342.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hay SI, Guerra CA, Tatem AJ, Noor AM, Snow RW: The global distribution and population at risk of malaria: past, present, and future. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004, 4: 327-336. 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01043-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Breman JG, Alilio MS, Mills A: Conquering the intolerable burden of malaria: what's new, what's needed: a summary. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 71 (Suppl 2): 1-15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. May J, Meyer CG: Chemoresistance in falciparum malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2003, 19: 432-436. 10.1016/j.pt.2003.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Plowe CV: Antimalarial drug resistance in Africa:strategies for monitoring and deterrence. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2005, 295: 55-79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. World Health Organization, Roll Back Malaria Department: Current WHO Recommendations on malaria control. [http://www.who.int/malaria/docs/MCT_workingpaper.pdf]
  7. Alonso PL, Sacarlal J, Aponte JJ, Leach A, Macete E, Milman J, Mandomando I, Spiessens B, Guinovart C, Espasa M, Bassat Q, Aide P, Ofori-Anyinam O, Navia MM, Corachan S, Ceuppens M, Dubois MC, Demoitié MA, Dubovsky F, Menéndez C, Tornieporth N, Ballou WR, Thompson R, Cohen J: Efficacy of the RTS,S/AS02A vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum infection and disease in young African children: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004, 364: 1411-1420. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17223-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schellenberg D, Menendez C, Kahigwa E, Aponte J, Vidal J, Tanner M, Mshinda H, Alonso P: Intermittent treatment for malaria and anaemia control at time of routine vaccinations in Tanzanian infants: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2001, 357: 1471-1477. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04643-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. White NJ: Intermittent presumptive treatment for malaria. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e3-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. O'Meara WP, Breman JG, McKenzie FE: The promise and potential challenges of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants (IPTi). Malar J. 2005, 4: 33-10.1186/1475-2875-4-33.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandramohan D, Owusu-Agyei S, Carneiro I, Awine T, Amponsa-Achiano K, Mensah N, Jaffar S, Baiden R, Hodgson A, Binka F, Greenwood B: Cluster randomised trial of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants in area of high, seasonal transmission in Ghana. BMJ. 2005, 331: 727-733. 10.1136/bmj.331.7519.727.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Macete E, Aide P, Aponte J, Sanz S, Mandomando I, Espasa M, Sigauque B, Dobano C, Mabunda S, Dgedge M, Alonso P, Menendez C: Intermittent preventive treatment for malaria control administered at times os routine vaccinations in Mozambican Infants: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Infect Dis. 2006, 194: 276-285. 10.1086/505431.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kobbe R, Kreuzberg C, Adjei S, Thompson B, Langefeld I, Thompson PA, Abruquah HH, Kreuels B, Ayim M, Busch W, Marks F, Amoah K, Opoku E, Meyer CG, Adjei O, May J: A Controlled Trial on Extended Intermittent Preventive Antimalarial Treatment of Infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 45: 16-25. 10.1086/518575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kreuels B, Kobbe R, Adjei S, Kreuzberg C, von Reden C, Baeter K, Klug S, Busch W, Adjei O, May J: Spatial variation of malariaincidence in young children from a geographically homogeneous areawith high endemicity. J Infect Dis. 2007,Google Scholar
  15. Kobbe R, Neuhoff R, Marks F, Adjei S, Langefeld I, Adjei O, Meyer CG, May J: Seasonal variation and high multiplicity of first Plasmodium falciparum infections in children from a holoendemic area in Ghana, West Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11: 613-619. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01618.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Marks F, Evans J, Meyer CG, Browne EN, Flessner C, von Kalckreuth V, Eggelte TA, Horstmann RD, May J: High prevalence of markers for sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine resistance of Plasmodium falciparum in the absence of drug pressure in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005, 49: 1101-1105. 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1101-1105.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schreiber N, Kobbe R, Adjei S, Adjei O, Klinkert M, May J: Immune responses after single dose sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine indicate underestimation of protective efficacy of intermittent preventive treatment in infants. Trop Med Int Health. 2007, 12: 1157-1163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Survival Analysis. 1999, New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
  19. Marsh K, Otoo RJ, Hayes RJ, Carson DC, Greenwood BM: Antibodies to blood stage antigens of Plasmodium falciparum in rural Gambians and their relation to protection against infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1989, 83: 293-303. 10.1016/0035-9203(89)90478-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Snow RW, Molyneux CS, Warn PA, Omumbo J, Nevill CG, Gupta S, Marsh K: Infant parasite rates and immunoglobulin M seroprevalence as a measure of exposure to Plasmodium falciparum during a randomized controlled trial of insecticide-treated bed nets on the Kenyan coast. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 55: 144-149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Drakeley CJ, Corran PH, Coleman PG, Tongren JE, McDonald SL, Carneiro I, Malima R, Lusingu J, Manjurano A, Nkya WM, Lemnge MM, Cox J, Reyburn H, Riley EM: Estimating medium- and long-term trends in malaria transmission by using serological markers of malaria exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 5108-5113. 10.1073/pnas.0408725102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Francis D, Nsobya SL, Talisuna A, Yeka A, Kamya MR, Machekano R, Dokomajilar C, Rosenthal PJ, Dorsey G: Geographic differences in antimalarial drug efficacy in Uganda are explained by differences in endemicity and not by known molecular markers of drug resistance. J Infect Dis. 2006, 193: 978-986. 10.1086/500951.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenwood B: Intermittent preventive antimalarial treatment in infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 45: 26-28. 10.1086/518574.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hay SI, Rogers DJ, Toomer JF, Snow RW: Annual Plasmodium falciparum entomological inoculation rates (EIR) across Africa: literature survey, Internet access and review. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 94: 113-127. 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90246-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwood B: The microepidemiology of malaria and its importance to malaria control. Trans R Soc Trop Hyg. 1989, 83: 25-29. 10.1016/0035-9203(89)90599-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith DL, Dushoff J, McKenzie FE: The risk of a mosquito-borne infection in a heterogeneous environment. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2: e368-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020368.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith DL, Dushoff J, Snow RW, Hay SI: The entomological inoculation rate and Plasmodium falciparum infection in African children. Nature. 2005, 438: 492-495. 10.1038/nature04024.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Filion GJ, Paul RE, Robert V: Transmission and immunity: the importance of heterogeneity in the fight against malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 22: 345-348. 10.1016/j.pt.2006.06.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenwood B: Intermittent preventive treatment – a new approach to the prevention of malaria in children in areas with seasonal malaria transmission. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11: 983-991. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01657.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McDonald G: The epidemiology and control of malaria. 1957, London, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Beales FP, Gilles HM: Rationale and technique of malaria control. Essential Malariology. Edited by: Warrell DA, Gilles AGHM. 2002, London, UK: Arnold, 107-190.Google Scholar
  32. Molineaux L: The epidemiology of human malaria as an explanation of its distribution, including some implications for its control. Malaria: Principles and practices of malariology. Edited by: Wernsdorfer WH, McGregor Sir I. 1989, London, UK: Churchill Livingstone, 2: 913-998.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Kobbe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement