Open Access

The effect of a single blood meal on the phenotypic expression of insecticide resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles funestus

  • Belinda L Spillings1, 2,
  • Maureen Coetzee1, 2, 3,
  • Lizette L Koekemoer1, 2 and
  • Basil D Brooke1, 2Email author
Malaria Journal20087:226

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-226

Received: 19 June 2008

Accepted: 31 October 2008

Published: 31 October 2008

Abstract

Background

Anopheles funestus is a major malaria vector in southern Africa. Vector control relies on the use of insecticide chemicals to significantly reduce the number of malaria vectors by targeting that portion of the female population that takes blood meals and subsequently rests indoors. It has been suggested that the intake of a blood meal may assist female mosquitoes to tolerate higher doses of insecticide through vigour tolerance. It is hypothesized that during the process of blood digestion, detoxification mechanisms required for the neutralizing of harmful components in the blood meal may also confer an increased ability to tolerate insecticide intoxication through increased enzyme regulation.

Methods

Bottle bioassays using a range of concentrations of the pyrethroid insecticide permethrin were performed on pyrethroid susceptible and resistant laboratory strains of An. funestus in order to detect differences in insecticide susceptibility following a single blood meal. Based on these results, a discriminating dosage was identified (double the lowest dosage that resulted in 100% mortality of the susceptible strain). Blood-fed and unfed females drawn from the resistant strain of An. funestus were then assayed against this discriminating dose, and the percentage mortality for each sample was scored and compared.

Results

In the insecticide dose response assays neither the fully susceptible nor the resistant strain of An. funestus showed any significant difference in insecticide susceptibility following a blood meal, regardless of the stage of blood meal digestion. A significant increase in the level of resistance was however detected in the resistant An. funestus strain following a single blood meal, based on exposure to a discriminating dose of permethrin.

Conclusion

The fully susceptible An. funestus strain did not show any significant alteration in susceptibility to insecticide following a blood meal suggesting that vigour tolerance through increased body mass (and increased dilution of internalized insecticide) does not play a significant role in tolerance to insecticide intoxication. The increase in insecticide tolerance in the pyrethroid resistant strain of An. funestus following a blood meal suggests that insecticide detoxification mechanisms involved in insecticide resistance are stimulated by the presence of a blood meal prior to insecticide exposure, leading to enhanced expression of the resistance phenotype. This finding may be significant in terms of the methods used to control indoor resting populations of An. funestus if the mass killing effect of insecticide application proves increasingly inadequate against blood-feeding females already carrying the insecticide resistance phenotype.

Background

Malaria is the most prevalent vector borne disease worldwide, and predominantly affects third world and developing countries [1]. Many of these countries experience limited economic growth, which is, in part, exacerbated by the effects of malaria. The impact of malaria can be seen by decreased levels of productivity in home and work environments and by the added strain that this disease places on already overburdened health care systems [2].

The two major malaria vectors in southern Africa are Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus. Anopheles gambiae can be found in the northern-most parts of this sub-region [3]. Malaria in South Africa is hypoendemic. The primary malaria vector, An. funestus, is controlled by an indoor residual spraying (IRS) campaign that currently adopts a mosaic approach using DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane), carbamates and pyrethroids [4]. This approach was adopted after pyrethroid resistance was identified in South African and southern Mozambican An. funestus populations [5, 6]. Pyrethroid resistance in this species was closely associated with a dramatic increase in malaria incidence in South Africa during the period 1995 – 2000. Prior to this period, only DDT was used for IRS, but mounting international pressure to discontinue its use led to the implementation of pyrethroids as the insecticide of choice [7]. DDT was re-introduced for IRS in South Africa post 2000 and a five- to six-fold decrease in malaria incidence was recorded for the period 2001 to 2005 [4]. The development of insecticide resistance in other malaria vector populations in South Africa [8] induces additional cause for concern, and an understanding of the mode, expression and inheritance of insecticide resistance mechanisms has become increasingly important.

Insecticide resistance in insect populations is predominantly based on improved enzymatic sequestration and detoxification as well as by the alteration of insecticide target sites leading to insecticide insensitivity [9]. Improved enzymatic detoxification has been linked to three broad classes of enzymes, namely monooxygenases, glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) and non-specific esterases. Pyrethroid resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus [10], Culex pipiens pipiens [11], An. gambiae [12] and An. funestus [6, 13] has been linked to the increased activity of cytochrome P450s, members of the monooxygenase class of detoxification enzymes.

The P450 monooxygenases are a superfamily of enzymes that have been implicated in the detoxification of xenobiotics and endogenous metabolic products in insects [14]. Clusters of cytochrome P450 genes have been associated with pyrethroid resistance based on the chromosomal mapping of quantitative trait loci or QTLs [15, 16]. In southern African An. funestus, a QTL associated with pyrethroid resistance can be found on chromosome 2R. This position corresponds to the locality of a cluster of genes belong to the CYP6 class of P450 enzymes [15]. CYP6P9, located within this cluster, has been shown to be highly over-expressed in a pyrethroid resistant strain of An. funestus [13], confirming the importance of these enzymes in insecticide resistance.

Current evidence suggests a direct link between the increased expression of detoxification genes and the development of pyrethroid resistance in southern African An. funestus [13]. Since many major biological processes affect gene expression it is possible that insecticide detoxification gene expression may be stimulated by processes other than insecticide exposure. The upregulation of cytochrome P450s in response to a blood meal has been demonstrated in C. pipiens [17] and Aedes aegypti [18]. It is hypothesized that the detoxification of xenobiotics and toxic blood components in the An. funestus midgut may inadvertently result in an increased ability to tolerate insecticide intoxication.

Methods

Mosquito strains

Anopheles funestus colonies have been established and are maintained at the Vector Control Reference Unit of the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, NHLS (Johannesburg, South Africa). All colonies are maintained under standard insectary conditions [19]. The two An. funestus strains used were: Fumoz-R, which originates from southern Mozambique and has been intensively selected for pyrethroid resistance [19], and FANG, which originates from Angola and is susceptible to pyrethroids.

Insecticide dose-response experiments

The process of blood meal digestion may activate detoxification systems required to detoxify xenobiotics present in the blood. Hence, it was decided that insecticide susceptibility should be investigated at different stages during the blood digestion process. The early stage of digestion was investigated four hours post blood meal based on the assumption that those genes involved in the digestion process would have been expressed by that time. The later stage of the digestion process was investigated at 18 hours post blood meal to allow for the possibility that different genes may have been upregulated by that time.

Three to four day old female cohorts from each strain were collected. Each cohort was divided into two groups, one fed on 10% sucrose solution and the other to be blood-fed. Blood meals were offered in a darkened room with an ambient temperature of 25°C. Only females that took blood were subsequently tested for susceptibility to permethrin. Following blood-feeding, a 10% sucrose solution was made available to all the females for either four hours or 18 hours prior to permethrin exposure.

Dose-mortality responses comparing blood-fed versus unfed samples from the permethrin resistant and susceptible An. funestus colonies were assayed according to the CDC bottle bioassay method [20]. Glass bottles (250 ml volume) were coated with the following range of permethrin concentrations (μg of permethrin/250 ml bottle): 0.1 μg, 1 μg, 10 μg, 25 μg, 50 μg, 100 μg, 250 μg, 500 μg and 1000 μg. Appropriate amounts of permethrin (Sigma catalogue 45614) were dissolved in 1 ml acetone as a carrier. Each bottle was used a maximum of three times before being discarded.

Each series of insecticide exposures lasted one hour, following which all females were transferred to polystyrene cups with access to a 10% sucrose solution. Percentage mortality was recorded 24 hours post-exposure for each permethrin concentration. For each An. funestus colony, eight to twelve cohorts were used. The mean percentage mortality was calculated at each insecticide dose and the dose response curves plotted. The data was log transformed to allow for the calculations of the 50% lethal dose (LD50) value for each replicate of each cohort, using regression analysis. The mean LD50 and standard deviation could then be calculated for blood-fed and unfed, resistant and susceptible mosquitoes.

Dose specific responses following a blood meal

The WHO defines the discriminating dosage of insecticide to be used in resistance assays as twice the amount of insecticide required to kill 100% of an insecticide susceptible sample of the same species [21]. The susceptible FANG strain showed 100% mortality at approximately 50 μg/250 ml bottle. It was thus decided that investigations at 100 μg/250 ml bottle would be appropriate for dose specific assays against Fumoz-R. Insecticide dosages of 2 μg and 5 μg/250 ml bottle were chosen for dose specific assays against the susceptible FANG strain based on results from the dose-response experiments where the range induced approximately 50% mortality.

Three to four day old female cohorts from each strain were removed and divided into two groups: one for blood-feeding and one to be fed on 10% sucrose solution. Blood meals were offered four hours prior to the one hour permethrin exposures. Twenty to twenty five females were exposed per bottle through 9 to 11 replicates. Final mortality was recorded 24 hours post exposure and comparisons between blood-fed and unfed groups for each An. funestus strain were based on 2 sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA.

Results

Lethal dose response curves

Dose response curves were generated for the insecticide susceptible FANG (Figure 1) and permethrin resistant Fumoz-R (Figure 2) strains. No significant difference in susceptibility to permethrin between the unfed and blood-fed groups for both Fumoz-R and FANG (p > 0.05) was evident across the full dosage range, regardless of the lapse of time between blood-feeding and permethrin exposure. However, the Fumoz-R strain showed consistently higher levels of permethrin tolerance in the blood-fed group as compared to the unfed.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-7-226/MediaObjects/12936_2008_Article_701_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Percentage mortalities 24 h post exposure for the pyrethroid susceptible An. funestus strain (FANG), in response to permethrin exposures, with either (A) blood-feeding 4 hours prior to permethrin exposure or (B) blood-feeding 18 hours prior to permethrin exposure.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-7-226/MediaObjects/12936_2008_Article_701_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Percentage mortalities 24 h post exposure for the pyrethroid resistant An. funestus strain (Fumoz-R), in response to permethrin exposures with either (A) blood-feeding 4 hours prior to permethrin exposure or (B) blood-feeding 18 hours prior to permethrin exposure.

Figure 3 shows the dose of permethrin required to produce 50% mortality in each of the strains, for each of the treatment times (permethrin exposure at either 4 hours or 18 hours post blood-feeding). Fumoz-R showed significantly higher levels of insecticide tolerance as compared to the susceptible FANG strain (p < 0.05). The permethrin dose required to kill 50% of the resistant Fumoz-R samples was approximately 70 to 80 times greater than that for the susceptible FANG strain.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-7-226/MediaObjects/12936_2008_Article_701_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Comparison of dosages required to produce 50% mortality, 24 h post permethrin exposure, (A) in the susceptible An. funestus strain (FANG) and (B) the resistant An. funestus strain (Fumoz-R). Permethrin exposures were carried out at either 4 hours or 18 hours post blood-feeding.

Dose specific responses following a blood meal

The susceptible FANG strain showed no significant difference in response to permethrin exposure between the unfed and blood-fed groups, for both of the insecticide dosages tested (p > 0.05, Figure 4). The difference in response to permethrin exposure between blood-fed and unfed cohorts from the Fumoz-R strain was highly significant (p < 0.001) with the blood-fed cohorts showing a mean percentage mortality approximately five times lower than that of the unfed cohorts (Table 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-7-226/MediaObjects/12936_2008_Article_701_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Comparison of percentage mortalities 24 h post permethrin exposure at chosen discriminating dosages for the susceptible (FANG) and resistant (Fumoz-R) An. funestus strains. Permethrin exposures were carried out 4 hours post blood-feeding at 2 and 5 μg/250 ml bottle for FANG and 100 μg/250 ml bottle for Fumoz-R.

Table 1

Mean percentage mortalities at the discriminating dosages for the susceptible An. funestus strain (FANG) and the resistant An. funestus strain (Fumoz-R).

 

Dose/250 ml Bottle

Mean % Mortality

SE

n

p

FANG Unfed

2 μg

29.45%

2.57%

213

> 0.05

FANG Blood-fed

2 μg

26.31%

2.80%

216

 

FANG Unfed

5 μg

57.00%

2.42%

261

> 0.05

FANG Blood-fed

5 μg

51.33%

4.14%

246

 

Fumoz-R Unfed

100 μg

59.21%

5.01%

244

< 0.001

Fumoz-R Blood-fed

100 μg

11.37%

2.54%

245

 

All exposures on blood-fed individuals were carried out 4 hours post blood-feeding. (FANG: pyrethroid susceptible An. funestus, Fumoz-R: pyrethroid resistant An. funestus.)

"SE" = standard error; "n" = sample size; "p" = significance of difference between the unfed and blood-fed groups following 2 sample t-tests.

Discussion

The development of insecticide resistance in southern African An. funestus, and its dramatic effect on malaria transmission in South Africa, has highlighted the need to investigate this phenotype and its controlling factors. Pyrethroid resistance in southern African An. funestus has been linked to elevated levels of monooxygenase cytochrome P450 activity as the primary mode of resistance [6, 13]. It has subsequently been demonstrated that the resistance phenotype is inherited as a single, autosomal, incompletely dominant genetic factor [22] and that there is no compromise in reproductive and physiological fitness associated with resistance [23], leading to the prediction that pyrethroid resistance can be expected to spread readily within and between An. funestus populations in affected areas. If insecticide application is to remain effective, then this scenario must ultimately consider the response to insecticide exposure of older, blood-feeding females, which form that proportion of the population actively transmitting malaria.

The application of an adapted CDC bottle bioassay method [20] allowed for the quantification and comparison of the levels of insecticide tolerance in both insecticide resistant and susceptible An. funestus strains, in response to the effect of blood-feeding. The results presented in this study indicate that the permethrin resistant strain (Fumoz-R), which has been intensively selected for pyrethroid resistance, has a 70- to 80-fold increase in insecticide tolerance as compared to the insecticide susceptible strain (FANG). Although the insecticide dose response curves did not highlight any significant differences in insecticide tolerance between any of the blood-fed and unfed cohorts, the blood-fed resistant Fumoz-R strain consistently required higher dosages than its unfed counterpart in order to produce the same level of mortality. The lack of statistically significant differences between blood-fed and unfed cohorts may be an artifact of wide variation in response to insecticide exposure between batches of mosquitoes over successive generations.

The direct comparison of percentage mortality following exposure to discriminating dosages of permethrin showed that a blood meal did not significantly alter the degree of insecticide tolerance in the fully insecticide susceptible strain of An. funestus. This result suggests that vigour tolerance through increased body mass (and subsequent increased dilution of internalized insecticide) does not offer a significant measure of insecticide resistance. However, similar comparisons between blood-fed and unfed, insecticide resistant females from the Fumoz-R strain showed a significant increase in insecticide tolerance in association with a single blood meal. This result suggests that the presence of a blood meal combined with an already effective insecticide detoxification mechanism significantly enhances the expression of the resistance phenotype.

Given that IRS campaigns aim to target the biting portion of a vector population that rests indoors and that insecticide resistance phenotypes within An. funestus populations are becoming more prevalent, the data presented here warrant further consideration. The results presented here suggest that the presence of a blood meal and/or the process of its digestion activate a series of insecticide detoxification pathways which "prime" the mosquito for contact with insecticide, in all likelihood through the increased expression of P450 genes hypothetically associated with blood meal digestion and insecticide detoxification.

Conclusion

The fully insecticide susceptible An. funestus strain did not show any significant alteration in susceptibility to insecticide following a blood meal suggesting that vigour tolerance through increased body mass did not play a significant role in tolerance to insecticide intoxication. The decrease in insecticide susceptibility in the pyrethroid resistant strain of An. funestus following a blood meal suggests that insecticide detoxification mechanisms involved in insecticide resistance are further stimulated by the presence of a blood meal prior to insecticide exposure, leading to enhanced expression of the resistance phenotype. This finding may be significant in terms of the criteria that are used to evaluate resistance phenotypes determined by WHO [21] bioassay in field populations, because blood-fed female mosquitoes may show enhanced expression of the resistance phenotype, possibly allowing for earlier detection of insecticide resistance.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a grant from the Medical Research Council of South Africa to BDB.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Vector Control Reference Unit, National Institute for Communicable Diseases
(2)
Division of Virology and Communicable Disease Surveillance, School of Pathology of the National Health Laboratory Service and the University of the Witwatersrand
(3)
NRF Chair in Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand

References

  1. Guerra CA, Gikandi PW, Taten AJ, Noor AM, Smith DL, Hay SI, Snow RW: The limits and intensity of Plasmodium falciparum transmission: implications for malaria control and elimination worldwide. PLos Medicine. 2008, 5: e38-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050038.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chima RI, Goodman CA, Mills A: The economic impact of malaria in Africa: a critical review of the evidence. Health Policy. 2003, 63: 17-36. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00036-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Coetzee M, Craig M, le Sueur D: Distribution of African Malaria Mosquitoes Belonging to the Anopheles gambiae Complex. Parasitol Today. 2000, 16: 126-133. 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01563-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Maharaj R, Mthembu DJ, Sharp BL: Impact of DDT Re-introduction on Malaria Transmission on KwaZulu-Natal. S Afr Med J. 2005, 95: 871-874.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hargreaves K, Koekemoer LL, Brooke BD, Hunt RH, Mthembu J, Coetzee M: Anopheles funestus Resistant to Pyrethroid Insecticides in South Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2000, 14: 181-189. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00234.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooke BD, Kloke G, Hunt RH, Koekemoer LL, Temu EA, Taylor ME, Small G, Hemingway J, Coetzee M: Bioassay and Biochemical Analyses of Insecticide Resistance in Southern African Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae). Bull Entomol Res. 2001, 91: 265-272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coetzee M, Fontenille D: Advances in the Study of Anopheles funestus, a Major Vector of Malaria in Africa. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004, 34: 599-605. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hargreaves K, Hunt RH, Brooke BD, Mthembu J, Weeto MM, Awolola TS, Coetzee M: Anopheles arabiensis and An. quadriannulatus resistance to DDT in South Africa. Med Vet Ento. 2003, 17: 417-422. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2003.00460.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hemingway J, Hawkes NJ, McCarrol L, Ranson H: The Molecular Basis of Insecticide Resistance in Mosquitoes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004, 34: 653-665. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Xu Q, Liu H, Zhang L, Liu N: Resistance in the Mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Possible Mechanisms for Resistance. Pest Manag Sci. 2005, 61: 1096-1102. 10.1002/ps.1090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McAbee R, Kang K-D, Stanich M, Christiansen J, Wheelock C, Inman A, Hammock B, Cornel AJ: Pyrethroid Tolerance in Culex pipiens pipiens var molestus from Marin County, California. Pest Manag Sci. 2003, 60: 359-368. 10.1002/ps.799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nikou D, Ranson H, Hemingway J: An Adult-specific CYP6 P450 Gene is Overexpressed in a Pyrethroid-Resistant Strain of the Malaria Vector, Anopheles gambiae. Gene. 2003, 318: 91-102. 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00763-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Amenya DA, Naguran R, Lo T-CM, Ranson H, Spillings BL, Wood OR, Brooke BD, Coetzee M, Koekemoer LL: Overexpression of a Cytochrome P450 (CYP6P9) in a Major African Malaria Vector, Anopheles funestus, Resistant to Pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2008, 17: 19-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Scott JG: Review: Cytochromes P450 and Insecticide Resistance. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1999, 29: 757-777. 10.1016/S0965-1748(99)00038-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wondji CS, Morgan J, Coetzee M, Hunt RH, Steen K, Black WC, Hemingway J, Ranson H: Mapping a Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) conferring Pyrethroid Resistance in the African Malaria Vector Anopheles funestus. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 34-10.1186/1471-2164-8-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ranson H, Paton MG, Jensen B, McCarroll L, Vaughan A, Hogan JR, Hemingway J, Collins FH: Genetic Mapping of Genes Conferring Permerthin Resistance in the Malaria Vector, Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol. 2004, 13: 379-386. 10.1111/j.0962-1075.2004.00495.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Baldridge GD, Feyereisen R: Blood Meal and Cytochrome P-450 Monooxygenases in the Northern House Mosquito, Culex pipiens. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 1989, 25: 407-413. 10.1016/0048-3575(86)90015-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanders HR, Evans AM, Ross LR, Gill SS: Blood Meal Induces Global Changes in Midgut Gene Expression in the Disease Vector, Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003, 33: 1105-1122. 10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00124-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt RH, Brooke BD, Pillay C, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M: Laboratory selection for and characteristics of pyrethroid resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Med Vet Ento. 2005, 19: 271-275. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2005.00574.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Brogdon WG, McAllister JC: Simplification of adult mosquito bioassays through use of time-mortality determinations in glass bottles. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1998, 14: 159-167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. WHO/CDS/MAL/98.12: Discriminating Concentrations of Insecticides for Adult Mosquitoes. 1998, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Okoye PN, Brooke BD, Koekemoer LL, Hunt RH, Coetzee M: Inheritance of pyrethroid resistance in the major southern African malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008, 102: 275-281. 10.1179/136485908X278748.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Okoye PN, Brooke BD, Hunt RH, Coetzee M: Relative developmental and reproductive fitness associated with pyrethroid resistance in the major southern African malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Bull Entomol Res. 2007, 97: 599-605. 10.1017/S0007485307005317.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Spillings et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement