Skip to main content
Download PDF

Baseline susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae to clothianidin in northern Ghana

Malaria Journal volume 23, Article number: 12 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Clothianidin, an insecticide with a novel mode of action, has been deployed in the annual indoor residual spraying programme in northern Ghana since March 2021. To inform pragmatic management strategies and guide future studies, baseline data on local Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) susceptibility to the clothianidin insecticide were collected in Kpalsogu, a village in the Northern region, Ghana.

Methods

Phenotypic susceptibility of An. gambiae mosquitoes to clothianidin was assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) insecticide resistance monitoring bioassay. The WHO cone bioassays were conducted on mud and cement walls sprayed with Sumishield 50 wettable granules (WG) (with clothianidin active ingredient). Daily mortalities were recorded for up to 7 days to observe for delayed mortalities. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique was used to differentiate the sibling species of the An. gambiae complex and also for the detection of knock down resistance genes (kdr) and the insensitive acetylcholinesterase mutation (ace-1).

Results

The WHO susceptibility bioassay revealed a delayed killing effect of clothianidin. Mosquitoes exposed to the cone bioassays for 5 min died 120 h after exposure. Slightly higher mortalities were observed in mosquitoes exposed to clothianidin-treated cement wall surfaces than mosquitoes exposed to mud wall surfaces. The kdr target-site mutation L1014F occurred at very high frequencies (0.89–0.94) across all vector species identified whereas the ace-1 mutation occurred at moderate levels (0.32–0.44). Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto was the most abundant species observed at 63%, whereas Anopheles arabiensis was the least observed at 9%.

Conclusions

Anopheles gambiae s.l. mosquitoes in northern Ghana were susceptible to clothianidin. They harboured kdr mutations at high frequencies. The ace-1 mutation occurred in moderation. The results of this study confirm that clothianidin is an effective active ingredient and should be utilized in malaria vector control interventions.

Background

Malaria is endemic in all parts of Ghana, with seasonal variations being more pronounced in the Northern parts of Ghana [1]. In Ghana, malaria cases account for 10.4 million outpatient visits per year, 4.2% of which are children under the age of 5 [2].

Global malaria control and elimination efforts rely heavily on vector control interventions. Indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are the principal malaria vector control tools [3, 4]. These vector-based control measures have been deployed in malaria-endemic communities with high vector densities and high transmission rates in sub-Saharan Africa, resulting in significant declines in malaria burden in sub-Saharan Africa in the past decade [5]. At total of 67% of households in Ghana owned at least one ITNs in 2022. 47% of households in Ghana had full ITN coverage [6]. In Ghana, IRS is currently being implemented in 23 administrative districts, mainly in northern Ghana, where malaria transmission has been very seasonal and high [6]. Over the years, lambda-cyhalothrin (pyrethroid), deltamethrin (pyrethroid) and pirimiphos-methyl (organophosphate) insecticides have been successively utilized in the IRS programmes [7].

Intensive insecticide application and over-reliance on a narrow spectrum of insecticide classes have imposed an intense selection pressure over time, causing malaria vector populations to develop resistance to these insecticides [8, 9], which is hampering vector control efforts. Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) resistance to organochlorides and pyrethroids, is highest in West Africa and widespread in Ghana [10,11,12,13]. Studies in Ghana [10, 14] have reported on target site insecticide resistance mechanisms namely; kdr-L1014F, kdr-L1014S, N1575Y ace-1 (G119S) and metabolic resistance in Anopheles mosquitoes from Northern Ghana.

Recent reports of insecticide resistance to pirimiphos-methyl [15, 16], an organophosphate, have compelled the appropriate authorities to act in response to these insecticide resistance concerns. Hence, the Innovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC), Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have introduced a new class of insecticide (neonicotinoid) for malaria control programmes [17].

In response to insecticide resistance concerns, the National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP) through the US President’s Malaria Initiative has introduced a new insecticide, clothianidin for IRS in northern Ghana. SumiShield™ 50WG (containing clothianidin as the active ingredient) and Fludora Fusion™ WP-SB (active ingredient: clothianidin and deltamethrin), are recommended by the WHO for use in IRS to deliver insecticidal activity in malaria vectors via tarsal contact [18, 19].

In order to efficiently manage IRS and ultimately help the country meet the global malaria goal of eliminating malaria by 2030 [20], it is important to have up-to-date information on local vector susceptibility and resistance trends in order to inform the NMEP to make timely changes of the insecticides. This study, therefore, sought to determine local vector susceptibility to clothianidin in northern Ghana.

Methods

Study site

The study was carried out in Kpalsogu (09° 24ʹ 27″ N 00° 51ʹ 12″ W), a rural community in the Kumbungu District, northern Ghana (Fig. 1) where IRS with SumiShield™ 50WG is implemented.

Fig. 1
figure 1

 A map of Ghana showing the study site

Full size image

In this region the annual average temperature ranges from 24 to 34 ºC. The region has a unimodal rainfall pattern, with the rainy season occurring from May through November and the dry season from December to April. There is a large irrigation dam (Botanga irrigation dam) in this area which serves 13 communities [21], with several trenches and furrows irrigating the farms of the inhabitants, creating breeding habitats for mosquitoes.

Sampling of Anopheles gambiae immatures

Anopheles gambiae larvae were sampled from identified breeding sites in the community from April 2021 to August 2021. Geographical positioning coordinates and characteristics of the habitats (land use and vegetation) were documented. Samples were subsequently transported to the insectary of the PMI Vectorlink project in Tamale, Ghana, where they were raised into adults. Larvae were fed with ground fish meal (Tropical Fish Food Flakes) and under the typical rearing conditions (26 ± 2 °C; 80% ± 10% relative humidity (RH) with 12 h: 12 h light/dark cycle).

Upon pupation, pupae were collected into plastic cups and placed in mosquito cages for the emergence of adult forms which were fed with a 10% sucrose solution. About 3–5 days old female Anopheles to be used in the bioassays were held in WHO bioassay holding tubes for an hour to check for fitness. Anopheles with broken wings, legs or unable to fly were deemed unfit and discarded.

WHO insecticide susceptibility bioassays

One hundred and twenty 3–5 day-old unfed female Anopheles were used for the bioassays. Four exposure tubes were lined with filter papers impregnated with 2% clothianidin. Two control tubes were also lined with untreated filter papers. Twenty of the selected mosquitoes were placed in each tube and observed for 60 min. Mosquito knockdown scores were recorded at intervals of 10 min during the 60 min exposure period.

After the exposure period, the mosquitoes were transferred into clean holding tubes, and a wad of cotton soaked with 10% sucrose solution was placed on top of it. The mortality rate was checked after 24 h. Subsequently, each tube was checked for dead or alive mosquitoes and scored using the WHO insecticide monitoring guideline [22]. Mosquitoes that survived after 24 h were monitored for delayed mortality for an extra 168 h (7 days). Following the same procedure, a control experiment was conducted using the insecticide with susceptible Kisumu strain of An. gambiae.

WHO Cone bioassays

The cone bioassay was conducted in four different houses (2 with cement wall surfaces and 2 with mud wall surfaces). These walls were sprayed with SumiShield™ 50WG during the annual Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) programme conducted in March 2021 [23]. Four replicates consisting of 10 female Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes aged 3–5 days each were aspirated and transferred into cones that were fixed on walls of rooms sprayed with SumiShield™ 50WG. The mosquitoes were exposed for 5, 10, 20 or 30 min, transferred to plastic cups (10 per cup), and provided with a 10% sucrose solution. Mortality rates were observed for up to 7 days and scored using the WHO cone bioassay guideline [24].

Identification of Anopheles gambiae complex species

A total of 100 (about 10%) of An. gambiae s.l. exposed in the tube bioassays were morphologically identified using the keys by Gillies and Coetzee [25]. Individual mosquito legs were cut and used as Deoxyribunucleic Acid (DNA) templates to undertake PCR for discriminating the sibling species using the criteria described by Santolamazza et al. [26].

Detection of insecticide resistance markers

Extracted DNA from mosquito legs was used to detect the presence of insecticide resistance markers in the mosquitoes using convectional PCR protocols. The markers included Voltage-gated sodium channels (Vgsc-1014 F and Vgsc-1014 S) for target-site resistance mutations to pyrethroids and DDT in voltage-gated sodium channels and ace 1-119 S mutation, a marker of resistance to carbamates and organophosphates. Vgsc-1014 F and Vgsc-1014 S were characterized according to Martinez et al. [27] whereas Ace1-119 S was characterized as described by Weil et al. [28].

Data analysis

Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2016. Frequency distribution was used to describe An. gambiae s.l. species abundance. Graphs and tables were drawn using Microsoft Excel 2016. The WHO insecticide resistance monitoring guideline was used to define resistance levels. A test population was deemed susceptible if it had a mortality rate of 98% or higher; possibly resistant if the mortality rate was between 90 and 97% and scored as resistant if the mortality rate was lower than 90%.

Abbot’s formula was used to correct mortalities when mortalities in control setups were greater than 5%. Allele frequencies of kdr and ace-1 mutations were calculated. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium equation was used to calculate allele frequencies of resistant genotypes. A p-value less than 0.05 was noted as a significant departure from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Results

WHO insecticide resistance monitoring bioassay

After 30 min of exposure, less than 5% of the wild An. gambiae s.l. were knocked down compared to 51% of the susceptible Kisumu strain at the same time. After 60 min exposure to clothianidin only 13% of the wild population was knocked down compared to 78% of the Kisumu strain (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Knockdown rates of wild Anopheles gambiae s.l. mosquitoes and Kisumu strain after exposure to clothianidin. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval

Full size image

Mortality rates observed demonstrated a delayed effect of clothianidin in the wild Anopheles gambiae s.l. population. In the wild An. gambiae, the mortality rate observed after 24 h was 56% indicative of insecticide resistance. The exposed An. gambiae population reached a mortality of 98% after 120 h suggesting susceptibility. In the WHO insecticide resistance monitoring bioassay control test, a 99% mortality rate was observed for the Kisumu strain after 24 h indicating susceptibility (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Daily mortality rates of wild Anopheles gambiae s.l. and the Kisumu strain following 60-min of exposure to clothianidin. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval

Full size image

Mortality of mosquitoes exposed to clothianidin treated mud walls

For mosquitoes exposed to the clothianidin-treated mud wall surfaces, 5, 10, 20 min of exposure induced 60, 62 and 80% mortality after 24 h, respectively (Fig. 4A). However, the mortality rates of the mosquitoes was 98% after 144, 120 and 96 h, respectively. Finally, 30 min of clothianidin exposure killed all the mosquitoes (100%) after 48 h.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mortality rates of wild Anopheles gambiae s.l. exposed to clothianidin-treated: A mud wall and B cement wall surfaces. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval

Full size image

Mortality of mosquitoes exposed to clothianidin-treated cement walls

Mosquitoes exposed to clothianidin-treated cement wall surfaces for 5, 10 and 20 min had 72, 77 and 85% mortality at 24 h respectively (Fig. 4B). Mosquito mortality rates after these exposure times reached mortality rates of 98% at 120, 96 and 48 h post-exposure, respectively. 100% (100%) mortality was observed at 24 h in mosquitoes exposed to clothianidin for 30 min.

Species identification and insecticide resistance-mediating mutations of Anopheles gambiae complex andcharacterization of insecticide resistance genes

Out of the 100 An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes used for molecular identification of species, 63% were identified as An. gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.), 25% were identified as Anopheles coluzzii and 9% as Anopheles arabiensis. 3% (3%) of the specimen did not amplify by PCR.

The vgsc L1014F mutation occurred at very high frequencies across all vector species identified whereas the ace-1 mutation occurred at moderate levels (Table 1). The allele frequency of vgsc L1014F was 0.89 in An. gambiae s.s. (χ2 = 0.98, df = 60, P = 0.32), 0.92 in An. coluzzii (χ2 = 0.19, df = 23, P = 0.66), and 0.94 in An. arabiensis (χ2 = 0.03, df = 6, P = 0.86).

Table 1 Species composition and distribution of insecticide resistance markers in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from northern Ghana
Full size table

The ace-1 G119S mutation was also observed in all An. gambiae identified with frequency of 0.37 (χ2 = 20.83, df = 61, P = 0.0001) in An. gambiae s.s. 0.32 (χ2 = 5.54, df = 24, P = 0.019) in An. coluzzii and 0.44 (χ2 = 5.71, df = 7, P = 0.016) in An. arabiensis.

Discussion

Malaria vectors in Ghana have developed resistance to all four classes of insecticides i.e., pyrethroids, organochlorides, carbamates and organophosphates, threatening the sustainability of malaria vector control. The widespread insecticide resistance highlights the need to introduce new insecticide classes with diverse modes of actions to the key malaria vector control interventions. The insecticide clothianidin as an active ingredient of two main formulations was introduced into IRS programme in Ghana.

Here, the susceptibility of An. gambiae to this newly introduced insecticide was evaluated as well as the prevalence of insecticide resistance markers. It was observed that, malaria vectors displayed high-level susceptibility to clothianidin, and insecticide resistance mutations were highly prevalent in An. gambiae populations in northern Ghana.

The WHO susceptibility test results demonstrated a delayed killing effect of clothianidin on wild An. gambiae from northern Ghana. Unlike the neurotoxic insecticides, such as pyrethroids, carbamates, organochlorides and organophosphates, which are quick-acting and require only 24 h to reach maximum, clothianidin needed a maximum of six days for mosquitoes to reach full susceptibility [19]. In the cone bioassays, mosquitoes exposed for longer times required fewer days to become susceptible. Test mosquitoes exposed to clothianidin for 30 min according to the WHO standard’s protocol [24] required 48 h to reach 98% mortality.

The neonicotinoids act on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAchR) of insects causing stomach poison and acute contact toxicity [19, 29], which may be responsible for mosquito delayed mortality [19]. It was observed that mosquitoes exposed to cement wall surfaces recorded slightly higher mosquito mortality than those exposed to mud wall surfaces. Previous studies [23, 30, 31] in determining factors that affect residual efficacy of insecticides revealed that, insecticides sprayed on cement wall surfaces have a high residual activity, but a short residual life as compared to mud wall surfaces, which also gives a relatively low residual activity but with a longer residual life [4, 32].

The malaria vectors from northern Ghana harboured high frequencies of kdr and ace-1 mutations, suggesting resistance of mosquitoes to other classes of insecticides used in IRS. For clothianidin, delayed mortality needs to be assessed to avoid an underestimation of the efficacy and also to avoid a false reportage of vector resistance. [19, 33]. In 2019, Oxborough et al. [19] conducted a study to assess the susceptibility of malaria vectors to clothianidin in sixteen African countries, including Ghana. The findings from their study showed that, malaria vectors in Gbullung-Ghana were susceptible to clothianidin after 7 days, whereas, malaria vectors from Kumbungu-Ghana were found to be resistant. However, this current study found malaria vectors from Kumbungu to be susceptibility after 5 days. This finding corroborates with other studies [34, 35] across sub-Saharan Africa.

Since mosquitoes have become resistant to the currently used four classes of insecticides, the introduction of clothianidin for IRS in northern Ghana in 2021 offers a new perspective on controlling the resistant mosquito population. The occurrence of cross-resistance is less likely as clothianidin acts on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which is different from the target-sites of the four insecticide classes. Oxborough et al. [33] and Ngufor et al. [29] conducted studies to assess the susceptibility of pyrethroid-resistant An. gambiae to a mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin. Their results showed that these pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes were susceptible to clothianidin, corroborating the absence of cross-resistance. Clothianidin therefore promises to be a very effective insecticide for public health use against resistant An. gambiae.

The most abundant species identified was An. gambiae s.s, while An. coluzzii was modestly prevalent and An. arabiensis relatively scarce (< 10%). This is consistent with findings from other studies in the region [36,37,38]. Studies in Ghana and other parts of Africa [38,39,40], which ensures the larvae get adequate sunlight exposure. The higher abundance of An. gambiae s.s, and An. coluzzii was expected, given that, both species have been linked to temporary and permanent rain-dependent pools, respectively [38, 41]. The presence of An. arabiensis may be attributed to the dry sub-arid environment of the area. A previous study in the Northern region of Ghana noted a co-dominance An. coluzzii and An. arabiensis [38]. Anopheles arabiensis has a zoophilic preference, although it is also anthropophilic, which has implications for malaria vector control efforts targeting endophilic and endophagic vectors. Other integrated larval control management approaches such as biolarvicidals and environmental management may be used be to augment the impact of IRS.

Conclusions

In this study, An. gambiae s.l. were susceptible to clothianidin, but this insecticide showed a delayed killing effect. The exposure duration was negatively correlated with the time required for the mosquitoes to reach maximum mortality. Anopheles gambiae s.l. mosquitoes harboured high frequencies of kdr whilst ace-1 mutation occurred in moderation.

Availability of data and materials

All generated or analysed data is included in this article.

Abbreviations

Ace:

Acetylcholinesterase

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

IRS:

Indoor residual spraying

LLIN:

Long lasting insecticidal net

NMCP:

National Malaria Control Programme

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PMI:

President’s Malaria Initiative

RH:

Relative humidity

Vgsc:

Voltage-gated Sodium Channels

IVCC:

Innovative Vector Control Consortium

IRAC:

Insecticide Resistance Action Committee

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Tiedje KE, Oduro AR, Agongo G, Anyorigiya T, Azongo D, Awine T, et al. Seasonal variation in the epidemiology of asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum Infections across two catchment areas in Bongo District, Ghana. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97:199–212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Iddrisu D, Moyer CA. Using the Ghana malaria indicator survey to understand the difference between female and male-headed households and their prevention and testing for malaria among children under 5. Malar J. 2022;21:112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pryce J, Medley N, Choi L. Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide-treated nets. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;1:CD012688.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oxborough R. Trends in US President’s Malaria Initiative-funded indoor residual spray coverage and insecticide choice in sub-saharan Africa (2008–2015): urgent need for affordable, long-lasting insecticides. Malar J. 2016;15:146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. WHO. World Malaria report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. GSS. Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2022: key indicators report. Accra: Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) and ICF; 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  7. van den Berg H, da Silva Bezerra HS, Al-Eryani S, Chanda E, Nagpal BN, Knox TB, et al. Recent trends in global insecticide use for disease vector control and potential implications for resistance management. Sci Rep. 2021;11:23867.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fadel AN, Ibrahim SS, Tchouakui M, Terence E, Wondji MJ, Tchoupo M, et al. A combination of metabolic resistance and high frequency of the 1014F kdr mutation is driving pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles coluzzii population from Guinea savanna of Cameroon. Parasite Vectors. 2019;12:263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandeu MM, Mulamba C, Weedall GD, Wondji CS. A differential expression of pyrethroid resistance genes in the Malaria vector Anopheles Funestus across Uganda is associated with patterns of gene flow. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0240743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamid-Adiamoh M, Amambua-Ngwa A, Nwakanma D, D’Alessandro U, Awandare GA, Afrane YA. Insecticide resistance in indoor and outdoor-resting Anopheles gambiae in Northern Ghana. Malar J. 2020;19:314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Djègbè I, Akoton R, Tchigossou G, Ahadji-Dabla KM, Atoyebi SM, Adéoti R, et al. First report of the presence of L1014S Knockdown-resistance mutation in Anopheles gambiae s.s and Anopheles coluzzii from Togo, West Africa. Welcome Open Res. 2018;3:30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Camara S, Koffi AA, Ahoua Alou LP, Koffi K, Kabran J-PK, Koné A, et al. Mapping insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae (s.l). from Côte d’Ivoire. Parasite Vectors. 2018;11:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chabi J, Baidoo PK, Datsomor AK, Okyere D, Ablorde A, Iddrisu A, et al. Insecticide susceptibility of natural populations of Anopheles coluzzii and  Anopheles gambiae (sensu stricto) from Okyereko irrigation site, Ghana, West Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Forson AO, Hinne IA, Dhikrullahi SB, Sraku IK, Mohammed AR, Attah SK, et al. The resting behavior of Malaria vectors in different ecological zones of Ghana and its implications for vector control. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Grau-Bové X, Lucas E, Pipini D, Rippon E, van‘t Hof AE, Constant E, et al. Resistance to pirimiphos-methyl in West African Anopheles is spreading via duplication and introgression of the Ace1 locus. PLoS Genet. 2021;17: e1009253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pwalia R, Joannides J, Iddrisu A, Addae C, Acquah-Baidoo D, Obuobi D, et al. High insecticide resistance intensity of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) and low efficacy of pyrethroid LLINs in Accra, Ghana. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. WHO. List of WHO prequalified vector control products. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  18. WHO: List of WHO prequalified vector control products. Geneva: World Health Organization., 2020.https://www.who.int/pq-vector-control/prequalifiedlists/PrequalifiedProducts27January2020.pdf%3fua%3d1. Accessed 20 Nov 2021.

  19. Oxborough RM, Seyoum A, Yihdego Y, Dabire R, Gnanguenon V, Wat’senga F, et al. Susceptibility testing of Anopheles Malaria vectors with the neonicotinoid insecticide clothianidin; results from 16 African countries, in preparation for indoor residual spraying with new insecticide formulations. Malar J. 2019;18:264.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. WHO. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030, 2021 update. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031357.

  21. Abdul-Ganiyu S, Amaanatu MK, Korese JK. Water use efficiency and productivity for rice (Oryza sativa) in the Bontanga irrigation scheme of northern region of Ghana. Agric Sci Res J. 2012;2:362–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in Malaria vector mosquitoes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marti-Soler H, Máquina M, Opiyo M, Alafo C, Sherrard-Smith E, Malheia A, et al. Effect of wall type, delayed mortality and mosquito age on the residual efficacy of a clothianidin-based indoor residual spray formulation (SumiShield™ 50WG) in southern Mozambique. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0248604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. WHO, WHOPES. Guidelines for laboratory and field-testing of long-lasting insecticidal nets. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Coetzee M. Key to the females of afrotropical Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Malar J. 2020;19:70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, della Torre AJ. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008;7: 163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson M, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, et al. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major Malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998;7:179–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weill M, Chandre F, Brengues C, Manguin S, Akogbeto M, Pasteur N, et al. The kdr mutation occurs in the Mopti form of Anopheles gambiae s.s through introgression. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:451–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ngufor C, Fongnikin A, Rowland M, N’Guessan RJ. Indoor residual spraying with a mixture of clothianidin (a neonicotinoid insecticide) and deltamethrin provides improved control and long residual activity against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Southern Benin. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0189575.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Dengela D, Seyoum A, Lucas B, Johns B, George K, Belemvire A, et al. Multi-country assessment of residual bio-efficacy of insecticides used for indoor residual spraying in Malaria control on different surface types: results from program monitoring in 17 PMI/USAID-supported IRS countries. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Etang J, Nwane P, Mbida JA, Piameu M, Manga B, Souop D, et al. Variations of insecticide residual bio-efficacy on different types of walls: results from a community-based trial in south Cameroon. Malar J. 2011;10: 333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ibrahim SS, Manu YA, Tukur Z, Irving H, Wondji CS. High frequency of kdr L1014F is associated with pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles coluzzii in Sudan Savannah of northern Nigeria. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14: 441.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Agumba S, Gimnig JE, Ogonda L, Ombok M, Kosgei J, Munga S, et al. Diagnostic dose determination and efficacy of chlorfenapyr and clothianidin insecticides against Anopheles Malaria vector populations of western Kenya. Malar J. 2019;18:243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Dagg K, Irish S, Wiegand RE, Shililu J, Yewhalaw D, Messenger LA. Evaluation of toxicity of clothianidin (neonicotinoid) and chlorfenapyr (pyrrole) insecticides and cross-resistance to other public health insecticides in Anopheles arabiensis from Ethiopia. Malar J. 2019;18:49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sovi A, Keita C, Sinaba Y, Dicko A, Traore I, Cisse M, et al. Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) exhibit high intensity pyrethroid resistance throughout Southern and Central Mali (2016–2018): PBO or next generation LLINs may provide greater control. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Anto F, Asoala V, Anyorigiya T, Oduro A, Adjuik M, Owusu-Agyei S, et al. Insecticide resistance profiles for Malaria vectors in the Kassena-Nankana district of Ghana. Malar J. 2009;8: 81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Coleman S, Yihdego Y, Sherrard-Smith E, Thomas CS, Dengela D, Oxborough RM, et al. Partial indoor residual spraying with pirimiphos-methyl as an effective and cost-saving measure for the control of Anopheles gambiae s.l in northern Ghana. Sci Rep. 2021;11:18055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hinne IA, Attah SK, Mensah BA, Forson AO, Afrane YA. Larval habitat diversity and Anopheles mosquito species distribution in different ecological zones in Ghana. Parasites Vectors. 2021;14:193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Mwangangi JM, Shililu J, Muturi EJ, Muriu S, Jacob B, Kabiru EW, et al. Anopheles larval abundance and diversity in three rice agro-village complexes Mwea irrigation scheme, central Kenya. Malar J. 2010;9: 228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kweka EJ, Zhou G, Munga S, Lee MC, Atieli HE, Nyindo M, et al. Anopheline larval habitats seasonality and species distribution: a prerequisite for effective targeted larval habitats control programmes. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e52084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Klinkenberg E, McCall P, Wilson MD, Amerasinghe FP, Donnelly MJ. Impact of urban agriculture on malaria vectors in Accra, Ghana. Malar J. 2008;7:151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the people of Kpalsogu for permitting us to sample mosquitoes in their homes and farms. We greatly appreciate the staff of the US President’ s Malaria Initiative-Tamale (Edem Obum, Ernest Yaw Nsefo, Imoro Nurudeen and Abdullai Abdul Rahman). The authors also thank all the community field assistants for helping in the data collection.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health (NIH: R01 A1123074 and D43 TW 011513). The funders had no role or influence on the design of this study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data collected as well as in writing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, University of Ghana, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana

    Cosmos M. Pambit Zong, Abdul Rahim Mohammed, Christopher M. Owusu-Asenso, Yaw Akuamoah-Boateng, Isaac K. Sraku, Simon K. Attah & Yaw A. Afrane

  2. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Clinical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

    Sylvester Coleman

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, 3720 Spectrum Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA

    Liwang Cui

Authors
  1. Cosmos M. Pambit Zong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sylvester Coleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdul Rahim Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher M. Owusu-Asenso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yaw Akuamoah-Boateng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Isaac K. Sraku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Simon K. Attah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Liwang Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yaw A. Afrane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CMPZ and YAA conceived and designed the study. CMPZ, SC and YAA were responsible for designing and coordinating the entomological surveys. CMPZ and ARM were responsible for data collection. SC, SKA and YAA supervised the data collection. CMPZ and IKS carried out the laboratory experiments. CMPZ and CMO-A were responsible for the data analysis. CMPZ, CMO-A, YAB, LC, YAA drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final copy of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaw A. Afrane.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Scientific approval was obtained from the Ethics and Protocol Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana. Ref: CHS-Et/M.1-5.5/2021–2022.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pambit Zong, C.M., Coleman, S., Mohammed, A.R. et al. Baseline susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae to clothianidin in northern Ghana. Malar J 23, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04769-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04769-y

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us